Hi Friends,
Source : https://www.economist.com/node/21534849
What sort of construction is the underlined part below? I understand it is to explain more on "scheme" mentioned in the prior sentence; however, my question is regarding the construction - if we take out "because..." parts then only two words remain in the sentence, and If we keep "because..." parts then why there are commas in place?
Source : https://www.economist.com/node/21534849
What sort of construction is the underlined part below? I understand it is to explain more on "scheme" mentioned in the prior sentence; however, my question is regarding the construction - if we take out "because..." parts then only two words remain in the sentence, and If we keep "because..." parts then why there are commas in place?
Appreciate your inputs. ThanksYet in the light of day, the holes in the rescue plan are plain to see. The scheme is confused and unconvincing. Confused, because its financial engineering is too clever by half and vulnerable to unintended consequences. Unconvincing, because too many details are missing and the scheme at its core is not up to the job of safeguarding the euro.












