BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Set problem again

Expert replies
by garuhape » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:03 am
At alpha athletics club the members are required to play at least one sport besides their normal fitness training. In fact 33 members play tennis, 43 members play squash, and 42 members play golf. 16 members play at least tennis and squash, 18 members play at least squash and golf and 8 members play golf and tennis. If 5 members play all three sports, how many members are in the club?

What's wrong with my solution?

T = G1 + G2 + G3 - (those in 2 of the groups) - 2*(those in all 3 groups)

T = 33 + 43 + 42 - (8 + 11 + 13) - 2*(5) = 76

However, the OA is 81.

In the solution they say that #(tennis and golf) = 3 and not 8 but I do not understand why since in the question they say that "8 members play golf and tennis"

Thx
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by manpsingh87 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:28 am
garuhape wrote:At alpha athletics club the members are required to play at least one sport besides their normal fitness training. In fact 33 members play tennis, 43 members play squash, and 42 members play golf. 16 members play at least tennis and squash, 18 members play at least squash and golf and 8 members play golf and tennis. If 5 members play all three sports, how many members are in the club?

What's wrong with my solution?

T = G1 + G2 + G3 - (those in 2 of the groups) - 2*(those in all 3 groups)

T = 33 + 43 + 42 - (8 + 11 + 13) - 2*(5) = 76

However, the OA is 81.

In the solution they say that #(tennis and golf) = 3 and not 8 but I do not understand why since in the question they say that "8 members play golf and tennis"

Thx
No. of persons playing tennis are 33; golf 42;squash 43;

as no. of persons playing all the three games are 5; therefore no. of people playing at least tennis and squash alone would be 11; similarly no. of people playing golf and squash alone atleast would be 13; and no. of people playing tennis and golf alone would be 3;

now no. of persons playing tennis alone would be 14;
no. of persons playing golf alone would be 21 and no. of persons playing squash alone would be 14
adding all these we have 14+14+21+11+5+3+13 = 81
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion

by garuhape » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:22 am
manpsingh87 wrote:and no. of people playing tennis and golf alone would be 3;
Why? In the text it says that 8 members play golf and tennis and not that at least 8 members play golf and tennis.
Join the discussion

by manpsingh87 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:11 am
garuhape wrote:
manpsingh87 wrote:and no. of people playing tennis and golf alone would be 3;
Why? In the text it says that 8 members play golf and tennis and not that at least 8 members play golf and tennis.
8 member plays golf and tennis of these 8 member 5 were those which play all the three sports so we have to subtract these 5 persons from 8 to find those member which only play tennis and golf. make a venn diagram, and you'll realize your mistake.
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion

by garuhape » Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:25 am
manpsingh87 wrote: 8 member plays golf and tennis of these 8 member 5 were those which play all the three sports so we have to subtract these 5 persons from 8 to find those member which only play tennis and golf. make a venn diagram, and you'll realize your mistake.
I understand it now. It's because the 5 people are only included in the two groups and therefore we only have to subtract them once and not twice.
Join the discussion

by manpsingh87 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:42 am
garuhape wrote:
manpsingh87 wrote: 8 member plays golf and tennis of these 8 member 5 were those which play all the three sports so we have to subtract these 5 persons from 8 to find those member which only play tennis and golf. make a venn diagram, and you'll realize your mistake.
I understand it now. It's because the 5 people are only included in the two groups and therefore we only have to subtract them once and not twice.
yep...!!! bingo..!!!
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion

by force5 » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:20 am
yes great well explained
Join the discussion

by gmat-challenger » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:33 am
the question is misleading! I doubt you will encounter such a question on the GMAT. It should have said at least golf and tennis or shouldn't have mentioned "at least" in the previous couples.

take care
Join the discussion