BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

I give my total credence to and even am a supporter

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:08 am
Location: China, Shanghai

I give my total credence to and even am a supporter

by magic monkey » Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:16 am
I am repolishing my words in AWA, but I get very confused about the subtle difference between positions of the "am". Could anyone help me figure it out. Please tell me why in terms of the grammar. thanks a lot!

As the following sentence:
First, I give my total credence to and even am a supporter of this belief, ALWAYS focus on the Official materials!

1. Is "am" here right or good in a formal writing?

2. Should "am" concedes "even" or follows it? (and am even/ and even am)

3. Is it better if I replace "am" with "be"?
Top
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:00 am
The sentence structure in general is a bit confusing. What do you give credence to? I know that it is focus on official material but it takes too much reading to get there. Simplify your delivery and keep your thoughts clear - don't stuff too much info in each phrase.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:08 am
Location: China, Shanghai

by magic monkey » Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:08 pm
Jim@StratusPrep wrote:The sentence structure in general is a bit confusing. What do you give credence to? I know that it is focus on official material but it takes too much reading to get there. Simplify your delivery and keep your thoughts clear - don't stuff too much info in each phrase.
I will take your advice, thanks~!

but I'm still confused about the grammar here. (just suppose that there's one, then how should I use "am" here? Because I'v never seen an "am" used without following "I", didn't know if it's ok?? )

Please don't feel annoyed about my extra questions. Could you answer my following questions, thanks a lot!!

1. Is "am" here right or good in a formal writing?

2. Should "am" concedes "even" or follows it? (and am even/ and even am)

3. Is it better if I replace "am" with "be"?
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:08 am
Location: China, Shanghai

by magic monkey » Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:17 pm
so no one try to specifically answer my questions here? please just focus on "even" and "am".
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Sep 23, 2012 4:17 am
i received a private message about this thread.

the basic message of jim's post is on point: this is not worth worrying about at all. first, tiny issues like this will have no effect on your overall essay score. second, the essay is the least important part of the test anyway.

additionally, the AWA essay is definitely not the kind of thing on which you should be "repolishing" your words. you should just focus on crafting a decent, cohesive argument that actually makes sense; that should already occupy the entire time you get for the essay.

--

there is, of course, nothing wrong with the word "am".
you won't see it in gmat SC problems, because none of those sentences are written in the first person ("i"/"we"). (incidentally, none of them are written in the second person "you", either.)
"i give ... and am ..." is a parallel structure. 2 verbs. if you replace "am" with "be" -- which isn't a verb -- you get a nonsense construction.
the word order here isn't easy to explain, and is way beyond the scope of anything you should be worrying about at this point.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:08 am
Location: China, Shanghai

by magic monkey » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:17 pm
lunarpower wrote:i received a private message about this thread.

the basic message of jim's post is on point: this is not worth worrying about at all. first, tiny issues like this will have no effect on your overall essay score. second, the essay is the least important part of the test anyway.

additionally, the AWA essay is definitely not the kind of thing on which you should be "repolishing" your words. you should just focus on crafting a decent, cohesive argument that actually makes sense; that should already occupy the entire time you get for the essay.

--

there is, of course, nothing wrong with the word "am".
you won't see it in gmat SC problems, because none of those sentences are written in the first person ("i"/"we"). (incidentally, none of them are written in the second person "you", either.)
"i give ... and am ..." is a parallel structure. 2 verbs. if you replace "am" with "be" -- which isn't a verb -- you get a nonsense construction.
the word order here isn't easy to explain, and is way beyond the scope of anything you should be worrying about at this point.
It's quite incisive, especially the "crafting" part and "am/be" part. Thank you for clarifying this subtle difference here!
I even thought no one would reply it again. So moving~ thanks again!
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:34 am
magic monkey wrote:It's quite incisive, especially the "crafting" part and "am/be" part. Thank you for clarifying this subtle difference here!
I even thought no one would reply it again. So moving~ thanks again!
you're welcome.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1