B is the OA .cans wrote:IMO D
A) but it also decrease the revenue
B) lines inside is out of scope
C) we are talking about people who wait in line.... not about people who have passes.
D) If people don't prefer overcrowding, they might not come...
E) % and numbers are different.
actually it becomes somewhat easy once you know the oa . if you dont know the oa , u feel uncertain until u know the oahoji wrote:IMO: B
although entrance time is reduced to some extent, if the congestion in the park is heavy, then the managers plan will be unfeasible: more people cannot visit the park, and the park cannot make more money...
i think this helps...
agree...mundasingh123 wrote:actually it becomes somewhat easy once you know the oa . if you dont know the oa , u feel uncertain until u know the oahoji wrote:IMO: B
although entrance time is reduced to some extent, if the congestion in the park is heavy, then the managers plan will be unfeasible: more people cannot visit the park, and the park cannot make more money...
i think this helps...
Thanks Brian for helping . But the lines at the entrance are very short because majority of the visitors have passes , then why does it have to be that shortening the lines would bring in new peopleBrian@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey guys,
Thanks for the PM to join in! This one is a little tricky but keep in mind that the question is asking why the reasoning is flawed. And the reasoning is essentially:
-If we can reduce wait times, more people will come
The problem with C is that those people with season passes already exist - they're already NOT a part of the problem since they don't deal with the lines. His whole plan is to shorten lines to bring in NEW people who must either not come or not return for repeat business because they hate the lines. Those who never wait in line just don't count toward his proposal at all, since they wouldn't be affected either way by his proposal to shorten the outside wait time.
Hi Brian ,arent these very subtle difference between B , C and D . Wait time Inside , Wait time outside etcBrian@VeritasPrep wrote:Ah, good point - but remember that you cannot change the premises in the stimulus...those are always true. You can only attack the logic and the way that they're used.
The given information says that his proposal will reduce the wait from 30 minutes to 10 minutes. So we're stuck with a 30-minute wait, regardless of whether the season pass holders don't wait at all. That fact cannot change, so we do know that there is a significant wait for the new, single-use customers that he's trying to attract.
