x is the product of all the primes less than or equal to 59

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:52 pm
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:8 members
Hello,

Can you please tell me how to solve this:

Suppose x is the product of all the primes less than or equal to 59. How many primes appear in the set {x + 2, x + 3, x + 4, ..., x + 59}?

A) 0
B) 17
C) 18
D) 23
E) 24

OA: 0

Thanks a lot.

Regards,
Sri
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:47 am
gmattesttaker2 wrote:Hello,

Can you please tell me how to solve this:

Suppose x is the product of all the primes less than or equal to 59. How many primes appear in the set {x + 2, x + 3, x + 4, ..., x + 59}?

A) 0
B) 17
C) 18
D) 23
E) 24

OA: 0
Set = {x+2, x+3...x+59}.
The set above is composed of extremely large integers.
There is no way for a test-taker to prove that an extremely large integer is prime.
Thus, only one conclusion is possible:
NONE of the integers in the set above is prime.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Thanked: 205 times
Followed by:24 members

by GMATinsight » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:32 am
The answer of the question is Option A i.e. "o" however the solution/explanation is as follows:



Image
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Thanked: 205 times
Followed by:24 members

by GMATinsight » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:35 am
This is not relevant to the given question. However the method of checking a large number whether it's a prime number or not, can be studied from the following link.

Method 3 Is the most commonly used and known method.

https://www.wikihow.com/Check-if-a-Number-Is-Prime
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:38 am
gmattesttaker2 wrote: Suppose x is the product of all the primes less than or equal to 59. How many primes appear in the set {x + 2, x + 3, x + 4, ..., x + 59}?

A) 0
B) 17
C) 18
D) 23
E) 24
As Mitch pointed out, it's very hard to prove that an extremely large integer is prime.

That said, it is relatively easy to prove that some of the values are NOT prime (aka composite)
One approach is to use a nice rule that says: If N is divisible by d, then (N + d) is also divisible by d
For example, since 28 is divisible by 7, we know that (28 + 7) is also divisible by 7.

Since x = (2)(3)(5)(7)(11)....(53)(59), we know that x is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ..., and 53, 59
So, from the above rule, we can be certain that x + 2 is divisible by 2, x + 3 is divisible by 3, x + 5 is divisible by 5, . . . and x + 59 is divisible by 59.
At this point, we've can already conclude that all values in the form (x + prime) are composite numbers.

We can prove that other values are composite as well.
For example, since x = (2)(3)(5)(7)(11)....(53)(59), we know that x is divisible by 21. So, from the above rule, we can be certain that x + 21 is divisible by 21, which means x + 21 is composite.

For example, since x = (2)(3)(5)(7)(11)....(53)(59), we know that x is divisible by 15. So, from the above rule, we can be certain that x + 15 is divisible by 15, which means x + 15 is composite.

We can use the two techniques above to eliminate enough of the values to conclude (by the process of elimination) that the correct answer is A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image