GMAT PREP DS 2

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:20 am
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:19 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 10 times

by aleph777 » Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:40 am
Good problem. The thing to remember is that the principals that guide exponential relationships don't hold true when you're manipulating with other operations.

Statement 1 tells us that x^2 + y^2 > z^2. And I think the trap to watch for here is that while if x^2 > z^2 then you know that x^4 > z^4, the same is not true when you're adding exponential variables.

Let's say that 4^2 +4^2 > 5^2 because 16 + 16 > 25. But what happens when you raise to the fourth? 256 + 256 > 625? No! Therefore, insufficient.

Statement 2 has the same problem in even simpler terms. x + y > z could be 4 + 5 > 2. But it could also be 1 + 2 > -20. And so you'd have two different solutions in the original question. Therefore, insufficient.