In 2003, the number of girls attending Jefferson High School was equal to the number of boys. In 2004, the population of girls and the population of boys both increased by 20 percent. Which of the following could be the total student population at Jefferson High School in 2004?
a) 4832
b) 5034
c) 5058
d) 5076
e) 5128
this is from the Beat the Gmat practice questions but the video explanation didn't cut it for me.
Let girls = x, and boys = x.
2003 population = 2x.
for 2004, let girls = 1.2x and boys = 1.2x
2004 population = 2.4x
2.4x = 24/10(x) = 12/5 (x)
I came to this point during the practice quiz but got stuck.
After trying to figure it out, and reviewing the solution, still don't understand how and why 2004 needs to be divisible by 12 like the video states if 2004 population = 12/5 (x).
can someone explain this part?
thank you
BTG-PQ "Jefferson High School"
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Hi,
Hi, as x indicates number of girls/boys, it should be integer right?
Similarly 12x/5 should be integer right?
12x/5 will be integer when x is of the form 5k right?
As x is integer, k will be integer.
So, 12x/5 will be 12k where k is an integer
Hence, total population should be a multiple of 12
If you still don't understand my reasoning, consider and example
Let us take value not divisible by12
Let12x/5 be 6
Then x = 5/2 right?
But x is the number of girls/boys and it cannot be a fraction. It has to be an integer.
So, the number should be divisible by 12.
Hi, as x indicates number of girls/boys, it should be integer right?
Similarly 12x/5 should be integer right?
12x/5 will be integer when x is of the form 5k right?
As x is integer, k will be integer.
So, 12x/5 will be 12k where k is an integer
Hence, total population should be a multiple of 12
If you still don't understand my reasoning, consider and example
Let us take value not divisible by12
Let12x/5 be 6
Then x = 5/2 right?
But x is the number of girls/boys and it cannot be a fraction. It has to be an integer.
So, the number should be divisible by 12.
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
- Tani
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Thanked: 312 times
- Followed by:90 members
One approach is simply to figure out what the prior year's population would have been. Let the current number of students equal C, and the prior year's equal P. Since the population grew by 20%, C = 1.2 *P, or, restating C/(1.2) = P. Try dividing the answers (C) by 1.2 and you will find only one that gives you a whole number.
Tani Wolff
starting where you left off:
24/10 = 12/5;
12/5(2003 pop) = 2004 population
2003 population = 5x2004population/12
also we know that people need to be full integers (can't have 1/2 a person) so it needs to be divisible by 12.
test numbers by using this method: we know that 12 = 2^2 x 3; if it's divisible by 12, then 2 2's & 1 3 will be divisible by that number... save time by looking for a factor divisible by 3 first.
24/10 = 12/5;
12/5(2003 pop) = 2004 population
2003 population = 5x2004population/12
also we know that people need to be full integers (can't have 1/2 a person) so it needs to be divisible by 12.
test numbers by using this method: we know that 12 = 2^2 x 3; if it's divisible by 12, then 2 2's & 1 3 will be divisible by that number... save time by looking for a factor divisible by 3 first.
- Ashley@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am
- Location: Cambridge, MA
- Thanked: 192 times
- Followed by:121 members
- GMAT Score:780
Hey there,
A clearer (if slightly less direct) way to think of this might be to start with that logic closer to the beginning of the problem. The key is really that since 20% = 1/5, so a 20% increase means that for every five students there were originally, you gain one new student. Now if we were talking approximately (which it's key to this problem that we're *not*) or if we were talking about say, a length increasing by 20%, this wouldn't be very restrictive, because I can chop lengths into tinier and tinier decimal parts if need be, so if I needed to increase a length of 16 inches (for example) by 20%, I'd need to increase it by 1/5 of 16 inches -- in other words, by 3.2 inches. That'd be totally fine. But when we're talking about a population, we run up against the fact that it's physically impossible to have 3.2 children... I can ONLY have whole numbers of children. So if 20% (i.e. 1/5) of something needs to wind up giving me a whole number, the thing that I'm taking 1/5 of MUST BE a multiple of 5. Try to take 1/5 of anything that's not divisible by 5, and your answer will never wind up whole.
Now that we know that, we can turn to the fact that the number of girls after the increase will be 6/5 of the original number of girls (1 + 1/5 = 5/5 + 1/5 = 6/5). That means this new number MUST BE a multiple of 6, since it's 6*1/5 of the original number, and we know that 1/5 of the original number was a whole number. But now here comes the additionally tricky part -- we're told that # of boys = # of girls. So if I've got that the number of girls is a multiple of 6 and the number of boys is that same multiple of 6, then the total number of boys + girls = 2*a multiple of 6. Taking any multiple of 6 and multiplying it by 2 will yield a multiple of (6)(2), i.e. a multiple of 12. So there you go!
A clearer (if slightly less direct) way to think of this might be to start with that logic closer to the beginning of the problem. The key is really that since 20% = 1/5, so a 20% increase means that for every five students there were originally, you gain one new student. Now if we were talking approximately (which it's key to this problem that we're *not*) or if we were talking about say, a length increasing by 20%, this wouldn't be very restrictive, because I can chop lengths into tinier and tinier decimal parts if need be, so if I needed to increase a length of 16 inches (for example) by 20%, I'd need to increase it by 1/5 of 16 inches -- in other words, by 3.2 inches. That'd be totally fine. But when we're talking about a population, we run up against the fact that it's physically impossible to have 3.2 children... I can ONLY have whole numbers of children. So if 20% (i.e. 1/5) of something needs to wind up giving me a whole number, the thing that I'm taking 1/5 of MUST BE a multiple of 5. Try to take 1/5 of anything that's not divisible by 5, and your answer will never wind up whole.
Now that we know that, we can turn to the fact that the number of girls after the increase will be 6/5 of the original number of girls (1 + 1/5 = 5/5 + 1/5 = 6/5). That means this new number MUST BE a multiple of 6, since it's 6*1/5 of the original number, and we know that 1/5 of the original number was a whole number. But now here comes the additionally tricky part -- we're told that # of boys = # of girls. So if I've got that the number of girls is a multiple of 6 and the number of boys is that same multiple of 6, then the total number of boys + girls = 2*a multiple of 6. Taking any multiple of 6 and multiplying it by 2 will yield a multiple of (6)(2), i.e. a multiple of 12. So there you go!
Ashley Newman-Owens
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep
Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep
Post helpful? Mosey your cursor on over to that Thank button and click, please! I will bake you an imaginary cake.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:41 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
Students 2003 2004
Girls x 1.2x
Boys x 1.2x
_____________________
Total 2x 2.4x
A) 2.4x=4832 x=4832/2.4 => x=48320/24
B) 2.4x=5034 x=5034/2.4 => x=50340/24
C) 2.4x=5058 x=5058/2.4 => x=50580/24
D) 2.4x=5076 x=5076/2.4 => x=50760/24
E) 2.4x=5128 x=5128/2.4 => x=51280/24
E
Girls x 1.2x
Boys x 1.2x
_____________________
Total 2x 2.4x
A) 2.4x=4832 x=4832/2.4 => x=48320/24
B) 2.4x=5034 x=5034/2.4 => x=50340/24
C) 2.4x=5058 x=5058/2.4 => x=50580/24
D) 2.4x=5076 x=5076/2.4 => x=50760/24
E) 2.4x=5128 x=5128/2.4 => x=51280/24
E
I think you mean D...sanabk wrote:Students 2003 2004
Girls x 1.2x
Boys x 1.2x
_____________________
Total 2x 2.4x
A) 2.4x=4832 x=4832/2.4 => x=48320/24
B) 2.4x=5034 x=5034/2.4 => x=50340/24
C) 2.4x=5058 x=5058/2.4 => x=50580/24
D) 2.4x=5076 x=5076/2.4 => x=50760/24
E) 2.4x=5128 x=5128/2.4 => x=51280/24
E
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Easier example:gnod wrote:In 2003, the number of girls attending Jefferson High School was equal to the number of boys. In 2004, the population of girls and the population of boys both increased by 20 percent. Which of the following could be the total student population at Jefferson High School in 2004?
a) 4832
b) 5034
c) 5058
d) 5076
e) 5128
Let students in 2003 = 100.
Then students in 2004 = 120.
100/120 = 5/6.
This shows us that the number of students in 2003 is 5/6 of the number of students in 2004.
We can plug in the answers, which represent the number of students in 2004.
5/6 of the correct answer will yield the number of students in 2003.
The resulting number of students in 2003 must be even so that it can be split equally between the boys and the girls.
Thus, we need to be able to divide the correct answer by 6 and then by 2, implying that the correct answer is a multiple of 12.
A multiple of 12 must be a multiple both of 3 and of 4.
The sum of the digits of a multiple of 3 must be a multiple of 3.
Answer choice A: 4+8+3+2= 17, which is not a multiple of 3.
Answer choice E: 5+1+2+8 = 16, which is not a multiple of 3.
Eliminate A and E.
The last two digits of a multiple of 4 must form a multiple of 4.
Answer choice B: the last two digits form 34, which is not a multiple of 4.
Answer choice C: the last two digits form 58, which is not a multiple of 4.
Eliminate B and C.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3