Decline- Freakinng out! Please help

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:25 am

Decline- Freakinng out! Please help

by ntinny » Sat Aug 07, 2010 3:37 pm
Hi

I just took my third practice test today and I'm freaking out. I scored a 580 (Q35, V35) this time but a 680 (Q44, V39) the last time i took it a few weeks ago. Took the same test from the GMAT prep. (The first test I took was before any proper studying and i got a 600.)

I have learned more math (my problem area) since the 680 practice test although my studying hasn't been as consistent. I'm not sure what to do. Is this normal? My test is scheduled for the first week of september and my goal is to break 700. I thought I was ok after I had done the 680 practice but now i'm not sure what to do.

Any advice would be helpful. Thanks
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:33 pm
I see that you math score is well down. It is possible that learning too much math has caused you to try to work too fast and "get every single problem?"

Did you evaluate what your mistakes were to see if many of them were errors that come from making minor mistakes based on trying to go too fast? Did you make assumptions based on your increased comfort level so that you were not as careful as in the past?

Look through the problems you missed and you can learn alot from your mistakes.

Hope that helps!

David
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:25 am

by ntinny » Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:49 pm
Thanks- your response was really helpful. I hadn't thought about it in those terms.

I think part of me does feel more comfortable (or now I can probably say it's more of a false sense of comfort) with the math and maybe I am going through it quicker. I also felt like i didn't have enough time in the past and wasted a lot of time (over the two minutes per problem) on some problems. I thought that if something was really stumping me that making an educated guess so that I can move to a problem than I could solve would be better than just trying to work it out the one I couldn't figure out. Is this not a good strategy?

I have been reviewing the mistakes when I do OG problems but have tried not to get too comfortable with the gmat practice test problems since i want to keep retaking the test.

Any tips would be appreciated.

Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:14 pm
You are correct to make an educated guess when you are about to run out of time. Let me be a little more precise in my advice. This is advice that has contributed to some tutoring students making remarkably quick improvement in their scores based on a change in philosophy. See if this can help you:

First, you need to understand that everyone (or nearly everyone) is going to miss problems on each section of the test, particularly on the quant side.

Many people base their "strategies" on the fear of missing questions. This leads them to the following approach - when they encounter a strange and difficult problem they become focused and alert and put maximum time and attention into this problem. Then when they see a problem that they can get right they try to not only get it right but do so in the shortest possible time so that they can make up the time they just devoted to the really difficult problem.

Here is the flaw in that scenario...between experimental questions that don't count and the chance of randomly guessing the correct answer, a test taker has about a 1 in 3 chance that a blind guess will not count against her. So a random guess will either be right or not count about 33% of the time. But if she attacks this difficult problem, even if she is able to narrow the problem down to just 2 choices - and assuming that one of those two is the correct choice - her odds are barely better than 50%. In other words, by continuing to devote her time and attention to a problem that continued to stump her, this test taker used three minutes or more and barely improved her chances of getting that question right. (And do keep in mind the very real chance that even if she does get it right that it will be an experimental question and not count in her favor).

Now that she has used too much time on the question that she struggled with she needs to make up that time somewhere - so she will make it up on the next few questions by hurrying so that she can save 20 seconds a question. This is the worst possible thing that she could do - other than just ending the test immediately. GMAT questions are deliberately tricky and are designed to specifically funnel test takers to the wrong choice - even when they fully understand the problem! The test writers want you to try to hurry so that you fall through their trapdoors into incorrect answers - for example, by answering the length of one side rather than the perimeter of the equilateral triangle. Of course the questions are usually set up so that you have to solve for the incorrect choice first and then go through that to the correct choice. If you are trying to "save 20 seconds" then you walk into these traps.

The better way to approach the quant section is this:

When you see a question that you can get right - devote the attention and the time that it takes to get it right. There is a difference between struggling for 3 minutes to come up with a strategy for a question you find very difficult (this is usually a mistake) and spending three minutes doing what it takes to ensure that you get a particular question (that you know you can solve) correct. It is a matter of approach to the test and it can make a huge difference. Do not try to steal 20 seconds from questions that you can get right only to hand that time over to a question that you will likely miss anyway.

Here are two things to think about:

1) If you do not have a specific strategy for solving a quant problem in about 1 minute and 15 seconds then you will want to choose from the viable answer choices and move on. It is precisely this type of question - where you have no strategy for a long time - that can sap the time and energy right out of your quant section on the test.

2) Set a time standard for yourself - I like to say that after question 25 I should have 25 minutes left (for the last 12 questions). If I am 5 minutes behind, I will just skip (randomly guess) at the next two problem solving questions I see. This will bring me back to the right pace. This is a better strategy than the alternative of " I can catch back up." Be careful here, trying to catch up usually means saving 20 or 30 seconds per question and we already know this is a mistake. Better to sacrifice two or three questions for the good of the test.

Finally, focus on getting questions right rather than on fearing that you might get some wrong. You will get questions wrong. But if you get say, 30 of the 37 right you will be back up to that 44 and this strategy will be one that gives you a consistent score rather than being subject to the swing you saw recently.

Good luck!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:25 am

by ntinny » Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:10 pm
Wow- thank you soooo much. That really makes sense. I think I really was trying to make up for lost time with the questions I thought I could get right and then falling into the trap. I will also try the time setting strategy because I do find that I start to panic when i feel like I'm behind. A million thanks!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:07 am

by GMAT GIRL » Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:15 am
Wow, I don't think I really understood how important overall strategy is on each section. I was focused mostly on math concepts and problem types, but I see now that having a good strategy (especially for the quant section) is just as important. I'll make sure not to fall into the trap of trying to hang on to every question!