Hello,
I was hoping someone would assist me in evaluating my profile.
Target Schools:
Stanford
Harvard
Wharton
Columbia
Numbers
3.8 GPA, Phi Beta Kappa from top tier public school (think Michigan, UCLA, Berkeley)
Major: International Relations
730 GMAT (46 quant, 45 verbal)
Work Experience
2 years as M&A analyst at top tier boutique investment bank
4 years of private equity/concentrated public value investing (unique relatively large family office)
My perceptions of my own weaknesses:
-Lots of folks have backgrounds similar to my own. How can I distinguish myself? Work takes up a lot of time, so it is next to impossible to have genuine extra-curricular activities that ADCOMs seem to be looking for.
-Is my quant score (75 percentile) sufficiently weak that I should retake the test? I have done significantly better on quant on nearly every single practice exam I took.
Reasons for applying: enhance my network, take a break from the grind and have a good time/travel.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
I was hoping someone would assist me in evaluating my profile.
Target Schools:
Stanford
Harvard
Wharton
Columbia
Numbers
3.8 GPA, Phi Beta Kappa from top tier public school (think Michigan, UCLA, Berkeley)
Major: International Relations
730 GMAT (46 quant, 45 verbal)
Work Experience
2 years as M&A analyst at top tier boutique investment bank
4 years of private equity/concentrated public value investing (unique relatively large family office)
My perceptions of my own weaknesses:
-Lots of folks have backgrounds similar to my own. How can I distinguish myself? Work takes up a lot of time, so it is next to impossible to have genuine extra-curricular activities that ADCOMs seem to be looking for.
-Is my quant score (75 percentile) sufficiently weak that I should retake the test? I have done significantly better on quant on nearly every single practice exam I took.
Reasons for applying: enhance my network, take a break from the grind and have a good time/travel.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.












