Is it A?
Requiring that X Y or Requiring X to Y is the idiom.
A looks good.
OA plz?
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Shrimp
Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction |
IMO B
I was confused between B and C but choose B because
their complaince with laws that require......protect is a non essential clause.
Shrimpers......saying that their compliance with laws...........is protecting........turtles.
This sentence is making sense without that, is maintaining the progressive tense and is parallel.
Hence B.
I was confused between B and C but choose B because
their complaince with laws that require......protect is a non essential clause.
Shrimpers......saying that their compliance with laws...........is protecting........turtles.
This sentence is making sense without that, is maintaining the progressive tense and is parallel.
Hence B.
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle - excluder devices be on shrimps nets protect adult sea turtlesschumi_gmat wrote:IMO B
I was confused between B and C but choose B because
their complaince with laws that require......protect is a non essential clause.
Shrimpers......saying that their compliance with laws...........is protecting........turtles.
This sentence is making sense without that, is maintaining the progressive tense and is parallel.
Hence B.
A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimps nets protect
B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
One doubt guys:
So the rule is that when we have "ing", this construction does not need to be followed by x to y or requiring that xy.?? Or is it because the meaning of the sentence implies that there is no uncertainty as the law was complied?












