Assumption Question

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

Assumption Question

by komal » Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:22 am
In one of several university mergers to have taken place recently, four institutions in the city of Hangzhou have been merged to form Zhejiang University, China's largest. Officials say such mergers help the schools achieve economies of scale, and minimize their administrative burdens. They also hope these 'mega-universities' will do better at attracting grant money and investment from Chinese and foreign organizations, who will be more eager to collaborate with big-name institutions. But out of China's population of more than 1 billion, there are now fewer than 7 million university students. Only 50% of China's middle-school graduates now go on to receive any secondary education. And for many of China's poorest families, including the children of millions of migrant laborers, finding any school at all can be a problem.

Q. Which of the following is an assumption in the passage?

(a) University mergers do not benefit a majority of the students in China.

(b) China has focused too much on a handful of top universities in major cities while failing to improve lower-level education throughout the country.

(c) Lower-level education is a serious issue in China as many children are unable to get access to educational facilities.

(d) University mergers, though favored by Chinese officials, do precious little for the majority of the students and children.

(e) The mergers of four universities in China to form the biggest university have failed to bring in the promised benefits.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:55 am
Thanked: 6 times

by VikingWarrior » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:21 am
I am confused here...I see all the options as conclusions rather than assumptions...What is the source and OA? If I had to answer this question then I would probably go with B though I am not convinced myself. Can some expert please clarify this?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:35 am
source is maxgmat booklet and oa is B

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:50 am
It looks like RC passage to me..:(..just trying to convince myself that these Qs should never appear..

Legendary Member
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by mmslf75 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:29 am
Suman

I second on that one ! ha ha

Komal
what's MAX GMAT ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:37 pm
Ashish,

Dude....I see people are posting just for the sake of it!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:29 am
This Q seems very weird . It seems to be collection of facts and doesnt look like an argument . For a argument you need the CONCLUSION and set of PREMISES acting as facts/evidence . Whats the conclusion here ? You can assume anything if you dont know what conclusion you are substantiating .

Was 'Conclusion' replaced with the 'Assumption' in the question stem here ?

Not sure if the original poster did a typo somewhere because if the question as it is , it doesnt seem to be good question at all.

Experts , please weigh in !!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:58 am
I have posted this question because like most of you here i could not understand the explanation that came along with the question.

Here's the explanation :

Conclusion : Education still remains a problem for the majority of students in China despite the mergers of several universities with big-name educational institutions.

To arrive at this conclusion, the author must have assumed something. Let us see what :

(A) Note that (A) is a restatement of the conclusion and cannot be an assumption.

(B) This can be one of the assumptions that the author bases his argument on. Note that the passage talks of mergers of universities with big-name institutes to attract investment, achieve economies of scale and minimize administrative burdens but the government must be missing the key issue of improving lower level education which is responsible for China's present plight.

(C) We are not asked to comment on the seriousness of the issue of education.

(D) This can be an inference because it is clearly implied in the passage however it is not an assumption.

(E) We are here clearly shifting the scope of the argument - the issue here is not whether the mergers have brought in the promised benefits or not.


Even after going through the explanation a few times i was not able to comprehend fully. Hence i posted the question here on this forum for some valuable input.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by sreak1089 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:22 am
Is this from IMS material? If so, I would suggest you not to rely on it. I would rather study from Power Score CR/LR bilble.

komal wrote:I have posted this question because like most of you here i could not understand the explanation that came along with the question.

Here's the explanation :

Conclusion : Education still remains a problem for the majority of students in China despite the mergers of several universities with big-name educational institutions.

To arrive at this conclusion, the author must have assumed something. Let us see what :

(A) Note that (A) is a restatement of the conclusion and cannot be an assumption.

(B) This can be one of the assumptions that the author bases his argument on. Note that the passage talks of mergers of universities with big-name institutes to attract investment, achieve economies of scale and minimize administrative burdens but the government must be missing the key issue of improving lower level education which is responsible for China's present plight.

(C) We are not asked to comment on the seriousness of the issue of education.

(D) This can be an inference because it is clearly implied in the passage however it is not an assumption.

(E) We are here clearly shifting the scope of the argument - the issue here is not whether the mergers have brought in the promised benefits or not.


Even after going through the explanation a few times i was not able to comprehend fully. Hence i posted the question here on this forum for some valuable input.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:56 am
komal wrote:I have posted this question because like most of you here i could not understand the explanation that came along with the question.

Here's the explanation :

Conclusion : Education still remains a problem for the majority of students in China despite the mergers of several universities with big-name educational institutions.

To arrive at this conclusion, the author must have assumed something. Let us see what :

(A) Note that (A) is a restatement of the conclusion and cannot be an assumption.

(B) This can be one of the assumptions that the author bases his argument on. Note that the passage talks of mergers of universities with big-name institutes to attract investment, achieve economies of scale and minimize administrative burdens but the government must be missing the key issue of improving lower level education which is responsible for China's present plight.

(C) We are not asked to comment on the seriousness of the issue of education.

(D) This can be an inference because it is clearly implied in the passage however it is not an assumption.

(E) We are here clearly shifting the scope of the argument - the issue here is not whether the mergers have brought in the promised benefits or not.


Even after going through the explanation a few times i was not able to comprehend fully. Hence i posted the question here on this forum for some valuable input.
In that case , it makes more sense to stick to standard SOURCEs .

Coming to this Q , first of all Conclusion is not an inference . Conclusion is something which got be explicitly mentioned in the argument . The Stimulus looks more like a Q where based on facts you could arrive at some inference or must be true facts. Assumption doesnt make sense till you have an explict conclusion . There is no explicit conclusion . GMAT assumption questions dont rely on implicit conclusions ( derived from just set facts ). So this question could have instead asked whats the main point or main conclusion the argument or something like what must be true ,based on stimulus.

This Q looks like want you to take 2 step approach . First , first derive an inference or conclusion and as a second step find out assumptions to support that conclusion . This style , i dont think i have ever seen so far in any GMAT style questions

If the Conclusion is what you stated then assumption is pretty clear . This Q with proper conlusion explicitly mentioned would be a fairly simple one.

I understand your concern regarding this question and its an obvious one. Would request you to explicitly cite source of such questions in future ( i know you did for this post somewhere in this thread)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:57 am
sreak1089 wrote:Is this from IMS material? If so, I would suggest you not to rely on it. I would rather study from Power Score CR/LR bilble.


Yes, a few others on this forum suggested the same. Thanks very much for ur input.... I am on the 11th chapter of powerscore cr bible and i can say it has helped me tremendously.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:14 am
(B) and (C) are main contender here.

(C) reflects the lower level education is a serious issue. That is not required to here. Comparision should be with University courses.