BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Efficiency and redundancy - Must be true

Expert replies
by codesnooker » Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:57 pm
Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics of linguistic systems: however, they can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication. If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word. However, if the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.

If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

(A) Efficiency causes a spoken language to be useful and redundancy causes it to be reliable.
(B) Neither efficiency nor redundancy can be completely achieved in spoken language.
(C) If a spoken language were completely redundant, then it could not be useful.
(D) If the human auditory system were a perfect receptor of sounds, then every permutation of language sounds would be an understandable word.
(E) If the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then a spoken language cannot be completely efficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:39 pm
IMO D
paraphrase of the stimulus
However, if the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.
Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by anshulseth » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:04 pm
D is wrong.
As we can't say that Not A implies Not B, then A implies B.

I feel it is C.
If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word.
Means if it is efficient, it can't be redundant.
Reversing it, if it is redundant, it can't be efficient, or useful.

Good question though.

Cheers
Asset
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:25 am
(D) and (C) --> Wrong
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:07 am
IMO E

check this stimulus

spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word.


now check this stimulus

then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.

now, when humans have defective receptors, permutations of spoken language cannot be an understandable word. implies tht the spoken language cannot be efficient when humans have defective receptors.

[/quote]
Join the discussion

by ManSab » Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:56 am
Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics of linguistic systems: however, they can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication.

It is A.
Join the discussion

by yeloaw » Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:04 am
ManSab wrote:Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics of linguistic systems: however, they can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication.

(A) Efficiency causes a spoken language to be useful and redundancy causes it to be reliable.

It is A.
Can't be (A).
(A) states efficiency = 100% useful and redundancy = 100% reliable. It does not state this anywhere in the passage. It just states efficiency and redundancy can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication.


(B) Neither efficiency nor redundancy can be completely achieved in spoken language.

IMO B
Passage infers any linguistic system needs at least two criteria: efficiency and redundancy

Without either, communication would be impractical.

The passage then states the requirements for perfect efficiency, but how this would also require [perfect reception in sounds] = no redundancy. If we have any redundancy then we cannot have perfect efficiency. Thus B.
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:43 am
OA is (E)
Join the discussion

by gdsurdy » Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:50 pm
I feel E is correct.

D is incorrect since it uses the word "every". The stimuli gives you no indication that if the receptor was perfect then every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:08 am
yeah E is the correct answer as it implies "If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word. However, if the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word. " that is mentioned in the argument.
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 3:53 am
My vote for E
Join the discussion