BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

columnar growth pattern

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

columnar growth pattern

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:49 am
16. The cause of the peculiar columnar growth
pattern displayed by junipers growing near
burning underground veins of lignite coal has
never been convincingly explained. Until recently,
the accepted theory posited that the abundance
of carbon monoxide in the local atmosphere
caused the columnar growth. However, a new
theory holds that the cause is the persistent
heat present near these underground fires
which, while not intense enough to inflame the
trees, can nonetheless change their normal
growth pattern.
The existence of which of the following would
provide the strongest support for the new
theory?
(A) A columnar juniper growing in an
atmosphere of intense heat and an
absence of carbon monoxide
(B) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere
of intense heat and an absence of carbon
monoxide
(C) A columnar juniper growing in an
atmosphere of normal heat and a high
concentration of carbon monoxide
(D) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere
of intense heat and a high concentration
of carbon monoxide
(E) A columnar juniper growing in an
atmosphere of intense heat and a high
concentration of carbon monoxide
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:04 am
would go for A

old theory=> carbon monoxide causes columnar growth
new theory=> persistent heat near buring lignites causes columnar growth


B and D are out as they talk of normal growth

A. supports the new theory only by eliminating the old theory

C. supports old theory. also talks of normal heat.

E. supports both theory.
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:27 am

by vishwambhar » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:20 am
A seems to an answer.

C, D and E are out as they all take into consideration old theroy along with new theory and do not prove that only new theory is valid not old theory for columnar growth of juniper. To strengthen the argument correct answer should prove that columnar growth of juniper is possible only through the reasonings of new theroy and not through old theory reasonings.

Out of A and B, B is not correct as it talks about growth of normal juniper not columnar juniper which argument is interested in.

Other takers please.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:04 am
Well done guys the OA is indeed A. Makes sense the explanations you have given. Thanks
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:10 pm

by dinhduy » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:52 am
Hello,

There is 1 issue I do not understand in this question:
However, a new
theory holds that the cause is the persistent
heat present near these underground fires
which, while not intense enough to inflame the
trees, can nonetheless change their normal
growth pattern.
Sorry if my English is not good enough. However from my understanding, the question states nothing about the intense heat (as the bold part in the question above).

For that reason I feel a little confused for finding the correct answer.

Could anyone help me?

Thanks.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1