Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable,

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members
Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-rays because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.

B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.

C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

D. The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.

E. Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.

[spoiler]OA: My doubt is this that is B wrong because it talks about ankle injuries whereas nowhere in the argument it's mentioned about the injuries?????

Is D wrong because it restates what is stated in the argument and talks about surgically repaired whereas argument doesn't talks anything about surgical reparation????[/spoiler]
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:23 am
See the correct answer and explanation
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=W5XO ... &q&f=false
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:07 am
vikram4689 wrote:See the correct answer and explanation
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=W5XO ... &q&f=false
Thanks a lot for sharing the link :-)