BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Logical Structure question

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

Logical Structure question

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:45 pm
Bill recently read a newspaper story that listed several symptoms of depression. One symptom was sleeping more than 12 hours a day. Bill does not want to develop depression, so he buys an alarm clock and makes sure to sleep no more than 8 hours a day.
If the article also noted that excessive sleeping is caused by reduced serotonin levels that result from depression, which of the following best describes the logical flaw in Bill's reasoning?

A] Bill has mistaken an explanation for an argument.

B] Bill has mistaken an argument for an explanation.

C] Bill has mistaken a premise for a conclusion.

D] Bill has mistaken a cause for an indicator.

E] Bill has mistaken an indicator for a cause.


The OA is E.

Getting this was not that difficult, just try it once...

Thanks!!!
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:08 am
Thanked: 322 times
Followed by:143 members

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:36 pm
Sleeping more than 12 hours a day is mentioned as one of the SYMPTOMS. However, there isn't an explanation as to WHY a person suffering from depression would sleep for such a long time. Therefore, buying an alarm clock and sleeping shorter would only make the symptom disappear. However, it would not influence the real CAUSE of the problem.

Also we can look at this argument from another point of view. According to Bill's conclusion all people who sleep 12 hours should suffer from depression. However, it is the other way round - some patients who suffer from depression also sleep too long. So Bill has mistaken a SYMPTOM for a CAUSE.

Therefore answer e is correct.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 214 times
Followed by:19 members
GMAT Score:740

by Birottam Dutta » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:46 pm
Yes, the actually cause of sleeping may be the reduced serotonin that results from depression.

So, lack of sleep is CAUSED by depression.

What Bill interprets from reading the initial part of the article is that lack of sleep CAUSES depression.

So, A is not correct as there is neither an explanation nor any argument.
b is in correct for the same reasons.
C is incorrect because there is no premise here, just a cause and effect.
D is incorrect because Bill has mistaken an indicator for a cause, not its reverse.
E is correct.

Hence, E!
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:08 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by jimmyjimmy » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:38 pm
[email protected] wrote:Bill recently read a newspaper story that listed several symptoms of depression. One symptom was sleeping more than 12 hours a day. Bill does not want to develop depression, so he buys an alarm clock and makes sure to sleep no more than 8 hours a day.
If the article also noted that excessive sleeping is caused by reduced serotonin levels that result from depression, which of the following best describes the logical flaw in Bill's reasoning?

A] Bill has mistaken an explanation for an argument.

B] Bill has mistaken an argument for an explanation.

C] Bill has mistaken a premise for a conclusion.

D] Bill has mistaken a cause for an indicator.

E] Bill has mistaken an indicator for a cause.


The OA is E.

Getting this was not that difficult, just try it once...

Thanks!!!
premise, cause, indicator, argument, explanation - cn u give one xamples for each? pls.,(its silly but getting confused every now and then)..
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:28 am
A classic correlation/causation mixup. Another good one is that ice cream sales and the murder rate both rise during the summer, so clearly ice cream makes people murderous :o

I wish I could sleep 12 hours a day :(
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1