prime factors

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

Re: prime factors

by sanju09 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:44 am
ketkoag wrote:If N's prime factors are 2 and 3, N=?
1) N<9
2) N has 12 factors.
If they talk about prime factors of N, shall we take N as a positive integer? If yes, then (1) alone is sufficient to answer the stem.

For (2) with the same intention (N as a positive integer), following are the ways in which N could have 12 factors:

N = (2^1)*(3^5), N = (2^2)*(3^3), N = (2^3)*(3^2), N = (2^5)*(3^1), hence it is alone not sufficient.

Go for A.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by ketkoag » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:25 am
sanju09, i have a question for u. if the question has mentioned that 'If N's prime factors are 2 and 3', then would it mean that there are no factors other than 2 and 3? coz i feel that its true always.
please lemme know if i'm wrong.....

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: prime factors

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:41 am
ketkoag wrote:If N's prime factors are 2 and 3, N=?
1) N<9
2) N has 12 factors.
This is clearly NOT a valid GMAT question - what's the source? I wouldn't trust it in the future.

On the GMAT, the two statements will NEVER contradict each other. In other words, there has to be at least some overlap between the two.

There is no number less than 9 that has 12 factors, so this question is impossible.

(We generally don't speak about prime factors of negative numbers, at least on the GMAT.)
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:04 am
ketkoag wrote:sanju09, i have a question for u. if the question has mentioned that 'If N's prime factors are 2 and 3', then would it mean that there are no factors other than 2 and 3? coz i feel that its true always.
please lemme know if i'm wrong.....
First of all this was not a problem that I should have attempted from the GMAT point of view, I must thank Stuart for pointing that out. I somehow took and treated each statement deadly alone and independent from each other, but I never minded that these are contradicting each other.

Yes ketkoag! Given that, my answer is still A. George has children named , Neil, Betty, and Gerard. It logically implies that George has only three children. Moreover, Neil and Gerard are George's children, never implies that George has exactly two children.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com