Indeed a creepy one...!!!
Would be great if we get to know the source of this question
My best guess is Option D
OA please
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
LSAT creepy one!!
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
I'll go with A.
If every honest farmer is poor, then only ones left are dishonest rich farmers or dishonest poor farmers. However, all poor farmers are already honest(according to the father). Therefore the group left is the dishonest rich farmers.
OA?
If every honest farmer is poor, then only ones left are dishonest rich farmers or dishonest poor farmers. However, all poor farmers are already honest(according to the father). Therefore the group left is the dishonest rich farmers.
OA?
@ kirvar
you are on a go!!
you have answered all the LSAT CR's correctly
OA A
I would definitely love to know your approach, how you attack questions of these sorts??
you are on a go!!
you have answered all the LSAT CR's correctly
OA A
I would definitely love to know your approach, how you attack questions of these sorts??
Source is already mentioned in the thread name itself: LSAT SetsWould be great if we get to know the source of this question
This argument can be written as condition statements, the hallmark of LSAT formal logic.
If rich, then not poor AND If poor, then not rich
If not rich, then poor AND If not poor, then not rich
If honest, then not dishonest AND If dishonest, then not honest
If not honest, then dishonest AND If not dishonest, then honest
If poor farmer, then honest AND If not honest , then not poor farmer
Substitute terms: If dishonest, then rich farmer
The author then concludes:
If rich farmer, then dishonest
You can see this is the reverse of the final premise after we substituted terms. So the author is assuming biconditionality (x if and only if y). The first two premises are already biconditional, so we can expect the reverse of some form of the final premise in the answers.
The correct answer is the reverse of the unaltered form of the last premise.
You really won't find questions this immersed in formal logic on the GMAT, so I wouldn't recommend laboring over these ideas, however they are interesting.
If rich, then not poor AND If poor, then not rich
If not rich, then poor AND If not poor, then not rich
If honest, then not dishonest AND If dishonest, then not honest
If not honest, then dishonest AND If not dishonest, then honest
If poor farmer, then honest AND If not honest , then not poor farmer
Substitute terms: If dishonest, then rich farmer
The author then concludes:
If rich farmer, then dishonest
You can see this is the reverse of the final premise after we substituted terms. So the author is assuming biconditionality (x if and only if y). The first two premises are already biconditional, so we can expect the reverse of some form of the final premise in the answers.
The correct answer is the reverse of the unaltered form of the last premise.
You really won't find questions this immersed in formal logic on the GMAT, so I wouldn't recommend laboring over these ideas, however they are interesting.
