BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tought inequalities

Expert replies
by mariah » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:31 am
If x/y >2, is 3x+2y<18?

a. x-y is less than 2
b. y-x is less than 2


oa a

question to experts : i know that we can add inequalities when both have same ">" signs but can we substruct inequalitities?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:03 am
mariah wrote:If x/y >2, is 3x+2y<18?

a. x-y is less than 2
b. y-x is less than 2


oa a

question to experts : i know that we can add inequalities when both have same ">" signs but can we substruct inequalitities?
Since x/y > 2, x and y have the same sign.
If x and y are both negative, then 3x + 2y < 18, and the answer is a definite YES.
Thus, our concern here is what happens to the value of 3x+2y when x and y are both positive.
If x and y are both positive, then x>2y -- information that we can use when we evaluate each statement.
To add inequalities, the <> must face the same direction in each inequality.

Statement 1: x-y<2.
Thus, y+2 > x.
Adding this inequality to x>2y, we get:
(y+2) + x > x + 2y
2 > y.
Since y<2, and x<y+2, x<4.
This means that the upper limit of 3x+2y = 3(4) + 2(2) = 16.
Thus, when x and y are both positive, 3x+2y < 18.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: y-x<2.
Thus, x+2 > y.
Adding this inequality to x>2y, we get:
(x+2) + x > y+ 2y
3y-2x < 2.
If y=2 and x=3, then 3x+2y = 12.
If y=10 and x=15, then 3x+2y = 60.
Since in the first case 3x+2y<18 and in the second case 3x+2y>18, INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.

Many DS questions that involve inequalities are best solved using a combination of algebra and plugging in values.
Algebra often is the most efficient way to prove that a statement is SUFFICIENT.
Plugging in values often is the most efficient way to prove that a statement is INSUFFICIENT.

I would advise against looking for ways to subtract one inequality from another.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by chieftang » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:45 am
We want x and y to be positive numbers in order to try to make the second equation be > 18.

1. If x - y < 2 and x/y > 2 then we know x < 3 because 3-1=2 and larger numbers separated by "almost 2" will fail the x/y > 2 check.

So we can test a number pair into the second equation (such as x = 2.9 and y = 1) which just barely satisfies x - y < 2 and x/y > 2, and see how close to 18 we get:

3*(2.9) + 2*(1) = 10.7

Larger number pairs can not satisfy both equations, and 10.7 much less than 18, so I'm comfortable with 1 being sufficient by itself.

2. If y - x < 2 and x/y > 2 then x and y can be very large numbers (x=100, y=20 works) or small numbers. So it's easy to see that conditions exist where the second equation is both greater than and less than 18, by inspection.

Therefore [spoiler]2 is insufficient by itself, and it contradicts 1 so we can't use 2[/spoiler].

Answer: A
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:54 am
Another approach, without adding or subtracting inequalities.

Once you reduce the question to both 'x' and 'y' being +ve.

We have, x>2y - - - - - (1)

Statement 1

x-y < 2

x < y + 2 - - - - - - (2)

Combining we have,

2y < x < y+2

2y < y+2

y < 2

Now if y < 2, we have x < 4 from (2) Sufficient

Statement 2

y - x < 2

x > y - 2 - - - - - - - (3)

From (1) and (3)

x > y - 2 (and) x > 2y

From here we can have infinite possibilities which satisfy these 2 equations. Insufficient.
Join the discussion