B: Asked Q
C: replied : ur assumption is wrong.
in order to reduce wear and tear, It was made like that, although it will reduce the typing speed.
B: those disadvantage has been over come now, so still the design is still same ?
Or why cant be change the design to get a higher typing speed?
C: ??
A: people who know typing demand the keyboard in equipment they buy. :--> They demand the keyboard.
B: Computer has replaced type writer and its keyboard is like type writer :--> is this the reason why we can not change the keyboard design?
C: The existing keyboard allows skilled operators to get good speed, though it little difficult :-->
D: A person can learn the new design : going with Bernard, so means refuting his own argument.
E: What is possible now is out of scope.
A and C are clear winner here.
Now in A:
they said proficient ppl demand keyboard in the equipment they buy :--> it doesn't deal with argument directly.
one can argue that since demand is there so we don't need to change the design.
If we change the design, it can effect the demand since only proficient ppl are demanding the keyboard.
C: says typing speed can be good on traditional key board, but this is hard to achieve.
So actually we can say that, then its better to change it to simple.
I think answer is A.
