BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

whose

Expert replies
by magnus opus » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:33 pm
WHOSE

1)Can " whose" refer to non living things and animals on GMAT? I am told it is not so.
However, Wren and Martin's English grammar states that "whose" means "of which" and gives the following example:
A Triangle whose two sides are equal is an isoceles triangle.

2) Should the relative pronoun whose and its antecedent always touch (be apposition)?

In the following sentence (an official problem where I have fused the question with the correct option) to whom does "whose" refer to?
- to only Jerry Garcia ?
- to BOTH Elvis and Gerry?
- or to "many musicians" (with ",including elvis and jerry," as a middleman, in which case "whose" needn't touch its antecedent )


Bluegross musician Bill Monroe, whose repertory, views on musical collaboration, and vocal style influenced generations of bluegrass artists, also inspired many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music differed significantly from his own.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:52 pm
I'll answer the first question.

Yes, it can refer to non-living things, but I am not sure about animals.

Case #1:

OG SC question #102, correct answer uses "whose" for clans.

Case #2:

Diagnostic test in the OG12, I think #48, the actual question uses "whose" to reference weapon.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:55 pm
magnus opus wrote:WHOSE

1)Can " whose" refer to non living things and animals on GMAT? I am told it is not so.
However, Wren and Martin's English grammar states that "whose" means "of which" and gives the following example:
A Triangle whose two sides are equal is an isoceles triangle.

2) Should the relative pronoun whose and its antecedent always touch (be apposition)?

In the following sentence (an official problem where I have fused the question with the correct option) to whom does "whose" refer to?
- to only Jerry Garcia ?
- to BOTH Elvis and Gerry?
- or to "many musicians" (with ",including elvis and jerry," as a middleman, in which case "whose" needn't touch its antecedent )


Bluegross musician Bill Monroe, whose repertory, views on musical collaboration, and vocal style influenced generations of bluegrass artists, also inspired many musicians, including Elvis Presley and Jerry Garcia, whose music differed significantly from his own.
It's unusual to see "whose" of non-people and I don't think you'll ever see "who" of non-people. As for your other question, "whose" would refer back to "many musicians", as the phrase with "including . . ." is parenthetical and set off by commas.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:45 pm
Answer to the first question:

A loud and clear yes. There are innumerable instances in OG itself where whose is used to refer to inanimate objects, ideas etc. A couple of examples have been stated above by uwhusky. I could not find anything for animals but I am sure that they will be correct if used properly.

Few simple examples of phrases with whose-
1) An idea whose time has come...
2) The girl whose tattoos are red...
3) The hyena whose haunting laughter-like calls are frightening...

Answer to the second question:

whose refers to many musicians. The takeaway is that whose need not touch the noun but the reference should be clear from the sentence.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:29 am
Jim:
Jim@Grockit wrote:It's unusual to see "whose" of non-people
incorrect.
and I don't think you'll ever see "who" of non-people.
that's correct.

for people, you must use "who/whom"; for non-people, you'll use "that" or "which".

--

however, note that "whose" can be used for either people or things, since "whose" is also the possessive form of "which"/"that".

for instance:
the person that i saw yesterday --> wrong
the person whom i saw yesterday --> correct
the person whose son i taught last year --> correct

the table that i bought yesterday --> correct
the table whom i bought yesterday --> wrong
the table whose legs i replaced yesterday --> correct

--

for one official example, see #114 in OG12 sentence correction.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:05 am
check out : https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/645/1/
It has details on relative pronouns too
@Deb
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1