BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality 6

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 4:12 am
1. Now since |x| < 2, this means that - 2 < x < 2. There are plenty of values between -2 and 2, so you can't guess x.

2. |x| = 3x - 2. As I've always said, this type of question must be broken down in two cases:
a. x < 0, when |x| = -x. This means that -x = 3x - 2, or that 4x - 2 = 0 or that x = 2/4 = 1/2. We must CHECK to see if x = 1/2 is consistent with our initial assumption, that x < 0. And it isn't! This means that there is no negative x to fulfill the requirements.
b. x is positive or equal to 0, when |x| = x. This takes us to x = 3x - 2, or 2x - 2 = 0. x = 1 and, after, checking with the initial assumption, we find that this solution is ok.
So in the end stmt 2 gives us only 1 solution and that is x = 1.

So B is the answer.
Join the discussion

by willbeatthegmat » Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:17 am
we r getting 2 values 1 & 1/2 from the 2 statement...on what basis did u eliminate 1/2..
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:59 am
I eliminated 1/2 because we originally assumed x to be negative in case a. Since the resulting x from equation -x = 3x - 2 is not negative, then there is no negative solution to this problem.
Join the discussion

by sfd2102 » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:14 pm
If you the above explanation isn't clear, the easiest thing to do is just check your answers. Plug 1/2 in for x and you see it is not the answer.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:46 pm
We could also logically eliminate negative solutions before even trying one out.

Let's examine the 2nd statement:

3x - 2 = |x|

Well, we know that |x| is greater than or equal to 0. Therefore, we can rewrite the statement as:

3x - 2 >= 0

3x >= 2

x >= 2/3

Therefore, x MUST be positive. Since x must be positive, we don't need to worry about the case of x being negative, which means that (2) will have only 1 solution for x: sufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion