BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Any help, please?

Expert replies
by fambrini » Tue Nov 08, 2016 4:43 pm
If |2x + 1| <= 0, then

A) x must be less than or equal to - 1/2
B) x must be equal to - 1/2
C) x must be larger than - 1/2
D) x could be 1/2
E) x doesn't exist

OA: B

I can develop the inequality in order to reach x <= - 1/2 or x >= - 1/2. I just don't understand the official answer.

Thanks,
Fambrini
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 08, 2016 4:48 pm
fambrini wrote:If |2x + 1| <= 0, then

A) x must be less than or equal to - 1/2
B) x must be equal to - 1/2
C) x must be larger than - 1/2
D) x could be 1/2
E) x doesn't exist

OA: B

I can develop the inequality in order to reach x <= - 1/2 or x >= - 1/2. I just don't understand the official answer.

Thanks,
Fambrini
An absolute value can never be negative.
Thus, it is not possible that |2x+1| < 0.
It is only possible that |2x+1| = 0.
|2x+1| = 0 if 2x+1 = 0:
2x+1 = 0
2x = -1
x = -1/2.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:36 am
Hi fambrini,

Before working through any of the 'steps' in this question, you should note the main 'concept' involved:

We're dealing with an Absolute Value - and the result of any Absolute Value calculation can NEVER be negative. It can be 0 or it can be positive. Thus, when we're given the following inequality...

|2X + 1| <= 0

... we should note the fact that the absolute value is 'less than or equal to 0.' Mathematically, it CANNOT be less than 0, so it MUST EQUAL 0. Knowing that, we have just one small calculation to get to the correct answer...

2X + 1 = 0
2X = -1
X = -1/2

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:09 am
fambrini wrote:If |2x + 1| <= 0, then

A) x must be less than or equal to - 1/2
B) x must be equal to - 1/2
C) x must be larger than - 1/2
D) x could be 1/2
E) x doesn't exist

OA: B
This is an interesting question because the absolute value of anything cannot ever be LESS THAN ZERO. Thus, we can rewrite the equation as |2x + 1| = 0 and solve for x. We note that the absolute value of an expression can only equal zero if the expression itself is equal to zero.

2x + 1 = 0

2x = -1

x = -(1/2)

Answer: B

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:25 am
fambrini wrote:If |2x + 1| < 0, then

A) x must be less than or equal to - 1/2
B) x must be equal to - 1/2
C) x must be larger than - 1/2
D) x could be 1/2
E) x doesn't exist
When solving inequalities involving ABSOLUTE VALUE, there are 2 things you need to know:
Rule #1: If |something| < k, then -k < something < k
Rule #2: If |something| > k, then EITHER something > k OR something < -k
Note: these rules assume that k is not negative


So, when we apply rule #1, -0 < 2x + 1 < 0
That's odd!
2x + 1 is greater than or equal to 0 AND less than or equal to 0
So, it MUST be the case that 2x + 1 = 0
Solve to get x = 1/2
Answer: B

RELATED VIDEO
- Inequalities and absolute value: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/985
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 2:09 pm
Let's do it conceptually.

|a - b| = 0 means "the distance from a to b is 0".

|a - b| ≤ 0 means "the distance from a to b is LESS THAN or EQUAL TO 0".

Obviously you can't have a distance that's less than 0, so

|2x + 1| ≤ 0 must really be

|2x + 1| = 0

and from there the problem is a cinch!

|2x + 1| = 0 means "the distance from 2x to -1 is 0", or 2x = -1, or x = -1/2.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 2:10 pm
And not to editorialize too much, but the CONCEPT of absolute value as distance is something I think more students ought to learn and remember: it can rescue you from some pretty thick algebraic fog!
Join the discussion