BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS quantative of measures

Expert replies
by Castor.kim » Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:08 pm
Dear GMAT volunteers,
This problem looks simple, but solve this problem incorrectly..
please someone tell me.. why 'A' is wrong..

[prob]
How many distinct integers are greater than x, but less than y?

(1) y=x+4
(2) x= √5

OA is C

I know that (2) is insufficient, and (1)+(2) is √5 < int < √5+4 ,so I can count the how many integers in that measures, sufficient
but,
in (1), problem said that x < a < y, and option (1) y=x+4 means..
x < a < x+4, so a have distinct 4 integers.. isn't it?? why wrong answer??
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:20 am
Castor.kim wrote:Dear GMAT volunteers,
This problem looks simple, but solve this problem incorrectly..
please someone tell me.. why 'A' is wrong..

[prob]
How many distinct integers are greater than x, but less than y?

(1) y=x+4
(2) x= √5

OA is C

I know that (2) is insufficient, and (1)+(2) is √5 < int < √5+4 ,so I can count the how many integers in that measures, sufficient
but,
in (1), problem said that x < a < y, and option (1) y=x+4 means..
x < a < x+4, so a have distinct 4 integers.. isn't it?? why wrong answer??
Let the STATEMENTS guide you.
Why does statement 2 indicates that x=√5 (approximately 2.2)?
Because this information likely has an effect upon STATEMENT 1.

Statement 1: y = x+4
If x=0, then y=0+4=4.
The number of distinct integers between 0 and 4 is THREE:
1, 2, 3.

If x=√5=2.2, then y=2.2+4 = 6.4.
The number of distinct integers between 2.2 and 6.2 is FOUR:
3, 4, 5 and 6.

Since the number of distinct integers between x and y can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x = √5
No information about y.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
As shown above, If x=√5=2.2, then y=2.2+4 = 6.4.
The number of distinct integers between 2.2 and 6.2 is FOUR.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Castor.kim » Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:34 am
Great explanation!!
Thanks instructor!! I owe you one!!
Join the discussion