BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

AWA Issue - Environmental regulations - Please rate, thanks!

Expert replies
by bluementor » Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:34 am
“Scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.”

I agree that companies should not change their products and processes in response to new recommendations unless it has been properly studied and regulated by the government.

If companies were to change their products and processes each time scientists define new standards, these companies will incur huge development costs a result of this change. For example, when electronic manufacturers started to buy-in to the lead-free standard suggested by environment, they incurred high cost in redesigning their products and processes to eliminate the use of lead, or chemically known as Plumbum, which is known to have detrimental effects on the environment. If manufacturers keep changing their environmental policies frequently, by revamping their manufacturing lines to keep up with new standards, they may very well soon be out of business.

Another reason why it is disadvantageous when companies jump straight into a newly defined standard before it is being studied and regulated by the government is that it may create more harm than good. For example, with regards to the lead-free recommendation stated earlier, upon adhering to the new lead-free standard, many electronic companies have started to dispose material in their inventories that contain lead. At that time, as the hype for lead free products are just beginning rise but before any government regulation was in place, there were no proper directions for disposing these toxic materials. Some companies have disposed these hazardous materials as normal waste, which has definitely done a lot of harm to the environment.

Therefore, simply following new recommendations of scientist may be bring more adverse effects than good. Companies should wait for regulations to be sanctioned so that the transition to the new standard can be carried out smoothly without producing any unwanted side effects.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

• Page 1 of 1