BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep -

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:12 pm
First consider (1) alone.
It is given that QR is equal to RS.
We need to know x.
Obviously (1) alone is not sufficient because suppose we move point U more towards the right, S remaining the same, x will increase.
Next consider (2) alone.
It says ST is equal to TU.
Even (2) alone will not be sufficient because suppose we move point Q downwards, more towards point P, S remaining same, the value of x will decrease.
Next combine both statements together and check.
On combining, we have that QR = RS and ST = TU.
Let angle PTR be a.
So angle UST is (180 - a)/2 = 90 - a/2. (since triangle SUT is isosceles).
Angle PRT is 180 - (90 + a) = 90 - a.
So angle RSQ is {180 - (90 - a)}/2 = 45 + a/2.
Now 45 + a/2 + x + 90 - a/2 = 180.
Or x = 45.
So both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.

The correct answer is (C).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:35 pm
thanks. Makes sense.

What is the approach to hit such questions ,in general, ?
Join the discussion

by ajayrkp » Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:39 am
I have a little different approach, however, the same concept.

- Based on statement (1), I denote angles RQS=RSQ=a; We can not find angle x using this info. However, this gives us angle PRT=180-2a
- similarly, Based on statement (2), denote angles TUS=UST=b; and we get angle UTS=180-2b ... however, this statement along is not sufficient.

Combined together, we know angle PRT+PTR=90=180-2a+180-2b ==> a+b=135 ==> x=180-(a+b) = 45
Join the discussion