BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 11 - Algebra Inequalities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:07 am
is the answer E ?
Join the discussion

by albertrahul » Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:33 am
Dear Vignesh, would you detail your solution please?
OA is not E.
Join the discussion

Re: OG 11 - Algebra Inequalities

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:48 am
albertrahul wrote:Is m != n?
[!= : not equals]

(1) m + n < 0
(2) mn < 0
Statement 2) is definitely enough on its own: if mn < 0, then m and n have opposite signs, so they can't be equal.

From Statement 1), if m and n are equal and both negative, this will always be true (try m = n = -1). So this is not sufficient; m might be equal to n, and might not.

B.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by albertrahul » Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:52 am
Thanks for reply Ian. OG also provides similar solution.

However, I want to know that why can't I assume m = 1/2 and n = 1/2, this also satisfies statement 2.

1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4 < 0
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:12 am
albertrahul wrote:Thanks for reply Ian. OG also provides similar solution.

However, I want to know that why can't I assume m = 1/2 and n = 1/2, this also satisfies statement 2.

1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4 < 0
1/4 is not less than zero!
Join the discussion

by albertrahul » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:51 pm
Thanks Ian.
Again, I missed out on basic.
Join the discussion