BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tricky DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kstv » Mon May 17, 2010 12:10 am
Combining 1 and 2
r=s=t or rst = r^3
3 of pqrst are integers , has to be r,s and as they are =
pqr^3 = 4
pq= 4/r^3
r^3 can never be 4
so p cannot be 1/q
IMO E.
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon May 17, 2010 12:28 am
kstv wrote:Combining 1 and 2
r=s=t or rst = r^3
3 of pqrst are integers , has to be r,s and as they are =
pqr^3 = 4
pq= 4/r^3
r^3 can never be 4
so p cannot be 1/q
if we're getting a definite NO, won't the answer be C in that case.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Mon May 17, 2010 1:00 am
and moreover, what is the reason behind directly combining both the statements?? why is that you negate 1 and 2??
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Mon May 17, 2010 1:39 am
fibbonnaci wrote:and moreover, what is the reason behind directly combining both the statements?? why is that you negate 1 and 2??
Absolutely!
If pqrst= 4, then is p= (1/q) ??

1) r=s=t

2) three of p,q,r,s,t are integers
(1) If r = s = t = k, which is either positive or negative, then p q = 4/k^3, and for p = 1/q be true, p q = 1.

Two questions now,

First one being:

Is 4/k^3 equal to 1, which we don't know or

The second one being:

Can 4/k^3 be equal to 1? Well, the answer is NO for a rational k, but yes for an irrational k.

Insufficient

(2) When three of p, q, r, s, and t are integers, many possible integers n in the range -2 < n < 2, with permissible repetitions are possible for the three of p, q, r, s, and t, leading to no fixed status of p and q.

Insufficient

Take them one now


If r = s = t = k, which is either positive or negative, and three of p, q, r, s, and t are integers, then at least one of r, s, and t is an integer, and if it's so, then k is an integer, and if it's really so then no integer has its cube equal to 4, hence [spoiler]p is definitely NOT equal to 1/q.

C
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by kstv » Mon May 17, 2010 2:03 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
kstv wrote:Combining 1 and 2
r=s=t or rst = r^3
3 of pqrst are integers , has to be r,s and t as they are =
pqr^3 = 4
pq= 4/r^3
r^3 can never be 4
so p cannot be 1/q
if we're getting a definite NO, won't the answer be C in that case.
Spot on.
It's a silly mistake on my part.
Join the discussion

by Haldiram Bhujiawala » Tue May 18, 2010 8:51 am
IMOC
Join the discussion

by im2crazyin » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:35 pm
it should be C
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:44 pm
fibbonnaci wrote:If pqrst= 4, then is p= (1/q) ??

1) r=s=t

2) three of p,q,r,s,t are integers
Is pq=1 ?

given pq * rst = 4; if rst=4 then pq=1

st(1) r=s=t, we don't know if r^3=4 Not Sufficient
st(2) r,s,t integers then pq may and may not be 1, as rst={1*1*1, 1*2*2,...} Not Sufficient

Combining st(1&2) r=s=t, when r=1 --> pq*1=4 False; when r=2 --> pq*8=4 False Sufficient
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:39 pm
I am going with C on this on as with
1) you get p=4/qr^3. tells nothing
2)3 of them are integers. tells nothing.

But when you combine them, then you know : rst are those 3 integers that are equal.

Thus,

In order for p=1/q then r^3 =4, as they are integers. No way it is possible. Hence, I select C
Join the discussion

by Ananda » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:52 pm
Need Statement 2, otherwise we bring Fractions to the party.
Need Statement 1, to restrict all kinds of integers to the party too.

Therefore to answer
p= (1/q)
we would need both.

Hence C.
Join the discussion

by pankajks2010 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:16 am
Statement 1: r=s=t
the given statement is pqrst=4; pqr^3=4; pq=4/r^3
Now, as there is no integer or fraction whose cube is equal to 4 our RHS in the equation (pq=4/r^3) can never be 1. thus, pq is not equal to 1. Thus, p is not equal to 1/q. Statement 1 is sufficient

Statement 2: three of p, q, r, s & t are integers. Now, this can be any of the three integers. Thus, insufficient to point out whether pq=1 or not. To illustrate:
a) Let p=32, q=1, r=1/2, s=1/4, t=1 this would satisfy pqrst=4. However, pq is not equal to 1.
b) Let p=1/2, q=2, r=1, s=1, t=4 this would satisfy pqrst=4 and pq=1
Thus, statement 2 is not sufficient.

Thus, the answer is A
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:22 pm
fibbonnaci wrote:If pqrst= 4, then is p= (1/q) ??

1) r=s=t

2) three of p,q,r,s,t are integers
If p = 1/q, then pq = 1 and rst = 4.

Question rephrased: Does rst = 4?

Statement 1: r=s=t.
If r=s=t=4^(1/3), then rst = 4.
If r=s=t=1, then rst ≠ 4.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: Three of p,q,r,s,t are integers.
No way to determine whether rst = 4.
Insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Given statement 1, rst = 4 only if r=s=t=4^(1/3).
Given statement 2, at least one of r, s and t must be an integer.
Thus, it is not possible that r=s=t=4^(1/3), so we know that rst ≠ 4.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by GmatFred » Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:25 am
Perfect explanation, thanks Mitch.
Join the discussion

by ronnie1985 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:38 am
S1 and S2 are alone not sufficient here as there is absolutely no clue to prove or disprove p = 1/q.
Combining, pq*r^3 = 4 => pq = 4/r^3. No way can this be 1. As if r,s and t are integers, pq cannot be 1.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Join the discussion