BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPREP: Modulus

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GmatMathPro » Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:10 am
Statement 1: x+y=z, so x=z-y. Replacing x with z-y in the given: |z-y|=y-z. The expression on the left is always non-negative, so this would only by true if y>=z, which we don't know. INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2: This is obviously insufficient by itself since it gives no information about y and z.

Statements 1 & 2: With both statements, we know that x=z-y AND x<0, using substitution, we know z-y<0 or z<y or y>z. As discussed above, |z-y|=y-z whenever y>z, so this is sufficient.

Answer is C
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:42 am
You could also go in the other direction:

Since x + y = z, y - z = -x.

So, we want to know if -x = |x|
We should know that this is true whenever x <= 0.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:26 pm
gmatboost wrote:You could also go in the other direction:

Since x + y = z, y - z = -x.

So, we want to know if -x = |x|
We should know that this is true whenever x <= 0.

Exactly, IMO:C
Join the discussion

by zaarathelab » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:30 pm
Experts, is this approach correct?

Since |x| = y-z
when x is positive, x= y-z
when x is negative, x = z-y

therefore, since we don't know the sign of x, x = y-z(when x is positive) OR z-y (when x is negative)

Statement 1

Simply says that x= z-y. But this doesn't give us the sign of x. x can be negative or positive. Hence |x| values will change accordingly.

Statement 2

Tells us nothing about the relationship between x, y and z

Combining the two,

If x=z-y and x= negative then |x| = z-y the second condition in the question stem is satifisfied.

Hence C
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion