i did it like this

6 _ _ 3*x _ _ 3*x _ _ 3*x

the two dash reperesent two numbers
now if u select the number at first dash then that number - 4 will give a number which is div by three---->n-4
if u select the number at second dash then that no. + 1 will give u a number which is div by 3---->n+1
hence n(n+1)(n-4)

n is greater than 6

for the product of 3 numbers to be divisible by 3, one of the three numbers should be a multiple of 3

So, let us go about trying to find the answer
we are looking for an answer that will defiinitely contain a multiple of 3 as one of the factors
i'll start off with choice B, to explain why it is wrong

b. n(n+2)(n-1)

the result of (n+2) is 3 greater than (n-1) i.e. (n+2) = 3 + (n-1), since we do not know the value of n, we cannot say if
n(n+2)(n-1) is divisible by 3. Eliminated!

a. n(n+1)(n-4)

adding 3 to (n-4) --> 3 + (n-4) = n-1

--> n(n+1)(n-1)
Notice that these 3 are consecutive integers. Since one of the 3 have to be a multiple of 3, the product is therefore divisible by three and thus A is that answer

oh thanks for the explanation Sars... i did not even think about looking at the equation like that... as groups related to each other. I mean I knew they were related to each other... but the way you put it made me think of it a different way.

Thanks!