CR-Theory

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 pm
Thanked: 2 times

CR-Theory

by sanyalpritish » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:39 pm
A theory is either true or false. Galileo's observations of Jupiter's satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account, Galileo's obseravations of Jupiter's satellites proved the truth of the Copemican theory.

The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that

a. whoever first obeserved something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
b. there are some possbile observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
c. the Ptolemaic theory and Coperrican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
d. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
e. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories , being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Why is C wrong
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:57 pm
sanyalpritish wrote:A theory is either true or false. Galileo's observations of Jupiter's satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account, Galileo's obseravations of Jupiter's satellites proved the truth of the Copemican theory.

The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that

a. whoever first obeserved something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
b. there are some possbile observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
c. the Ptolemaic theory and Coperrican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
d. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
e. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories , being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Why is C wrong
IS it D??

Legendary Member
Posts: 576
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:31 pm
Thanked: 97 times
Followed by:1 members

by liferocks » Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:06 pm
IMO the ans is E

In the argument author mentions two theories and concludes since one is false other is truth.But he does not consider that both of the presented theory can be false. this is what is mentioned in option E

what is OA?

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:19 pm
The correct answer is definitely choice E, and liferocks' reasoning is good.

Just because an observation is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account doesn't establish that it is consistent with (or will verify) the Copernican account. The observation can be inconsistent with both the Ptolemaic and the Coperncian theory--unless you assume that there is no other possibly correct theory. And that's what the author assumes--that both theories cannot be false (ie, that there is no ohter possibly correct theory).
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by ssgmatter » Fri May 21, 2010 9:27 pm
Testluv wrote:The correct answer is definitely choice E, and liferocks' reasoning is good.

Just because an observation is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account doesn't establish that it is consistent with (or will verify) the Copernican account. The observation can be inconsistent with both the Ptolemaic and the Coperncian theory--unless you assume that there is no other possibly correct theory. And that's what the author assumes--that both theories cannot be false (ie, that there is no ohter possibly correct theory).
Why C is wrong here?
Best-
Amit