-
cbears2010
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 1:06 am
Thanks in advance for your help!
I hope I don't sound ridiculous, but I came up with an interesting observation after completing three practice exams from Manhattan GMAT.
Exam #1: Q(50, 95%), V(45, 99%), Total: 770
Exam #2: Q(48, 86%), V(41, 93%), Total: 730
Exam #3: Q(51, 99%), V(45, 99%), Total: 780
I noticed that while my first two exams averaged 31 questions each with 700-800 difficulty, my third exam consisted of only 8 questions with 700-800 difficulty (I missed two questions early on, and so the difficulty of all subsequent questions was much easier).
Thus, I was hoping you could tell me if missing questions early on in the Quantitative section could potentially be a strategy for attaining a higher overall math score (via easier questions).
Thanks again for your help, and I look forward to hearing back from you!
I hope I don't sound ridiculous, but I came up with an interesting observation after completing three practice exams from Manhattan GMAT.
Exam #1: Q(50, 95%), V(45, 99%), Total: 770
Exam #2: Q(48, 86%), V(41, 93%), Total: 730
Exam #3: Q(51, 99%), V(45, 99%), Total: 780
I noticed that while my first two exams averaged 31 questions each with 700-800 difficulty, my third exam consisted of only 8 questions with 700-800 difficulty (I missed two questions early on, and so the difficulty of all subsequent questions was much easier).
Thus, I was hoping you could tell me if missing questions early on in the Quantitative section could potentially be a strategy for attaining a higher overall math score (via easier questions).
Thanks again for your help, and I look forward to hearing back from you!
