BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

twice as fast as

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:15 am
Thanked: 1 times
by manihar.sidharth » Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:54 pm
Q) In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than

OA after some discussion.
IMO without reason is not expected!!:)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 17 times
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:19 pm
IMO C. If it is the correct answer, maybe i can try explaining my choice.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pmFollowed by: 192 members
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:56 pm
ice_rush wrote:IMO C. If it is the correct answer, maybe i can try explaining my choice.
That's what I'd go with as well. How'd you get there?
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 17 times
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:47 pm
(A) wrong comparison - comparing the rate of increase with 1970's
(E) wrong comparison - the rate of increase can't be greater than 1970's
(D) we don't know what is faster than "THAT" -- I am guessing wrong comparison here as well.

so it came down between B and C. (B) sounds redundant (Wonder if there's another reason to strike off B). C is more concise and uses correct comparison.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:59 pm
IMO C

Rate cannot be fast or faster, rate can be high (e.g.twice as high as in 1970's)
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(D) two times faster than that of

Comparison is correct as rate can be greater but E changes meaning
(Original meaning=> R of 1980 = 2*R of 1970 ; E says R of 1980 > 2*R of 1970 )
(E) two times greater than

CORRECT in every aspect
(C) twice what it was in
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:15 am
Thanked: 1 times

by manihar.sidharth » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:30 am
OA is C..Can you please explain now!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by simone88 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:31 am
vikram4689 wrote: Comparison is correct as rate can be greater but E changes meaning
(Original meaning=> R of 1980 = 2*R of 1970 ; E says R of 1980 > 2*R of 1970 )
(E) two times greater than
While I do agree with you that rate cannot be fast or faster I don't agree that E is wrong for the reason you are saying.
two times greter does not mean >2* but means =2*
to me, the reason why it is wrong is that it should be "two times greater than the rate of increase in (otherwise you don't have a right comparison)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:35 am
manihar.sidharth wrote:OA is C..Can you please explain now!!!
Please refer to my explanation above
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:41 am
simone88 wrote:
vikram4689 wrote: Comparison is correct as rate can be greater but E changes meaning
(Original meaning=> R of 1980 = 2*R of 1970 ; E says R of 1980 > 2*R of 1970 )
(E) two times greater than
While I do agree with you that rate cannot be fast or faster I don't agree that E is wrong for the reason you are saying.
two times greter does not mean >2* but means =2*
to me, the reason why it is wrong is that it should be "two times greater than the rate of increase in (otherwise you don't have a right comparison)
"two times greater than the rate of increase in... underlined part is elided(ellipses) as it is apparent

Two times greater does not mean (=2*). In fact, the precise definition is:
X = 2*Y ... X is 2 times Y
X = Y + 2*Y ... X is 2 times greater than Y

I hope this cleared your doubt
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by simone88 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:59 pm
vikram4689 wrote:
"two times greater than the rate of increase in... underlined part is elided(ellipses) as it is apparent

Two times greater does not mean (=2*). In fact, the precise definition is:
X = 2*Y ... X is 2 times Y
X = Y + 2*Y ... X is 2 times greater than Y

I hope this cleared your doubt
could some expert confirm this thesis? because I believe that two times greater means that =2* and not =3*
could some expert confirm also that "the rate of increase in" can be elited as ellipses?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pmFollowed by: 192 members
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:06 pm
You run into that interpretation issue with percent changes as well, i.e "200% greater than..." I have two rules that I follow to make sure I interpret the question correctly:

1. X is Y times greater than Z (or X is Y percent greater than Z)

"Greater than" means we keep the original value, then add the change on top: "X is 200% greater than Y" should be translated as X = Y (original value) + 2Y (200% increase), and "X is 2 times greater than Y" should be translated as X = Y (original value) + 2Y (two times Y).

2. X is Y times Z (or X is Y percent of Z)

"Times" and "percent of" mean that we simply need to do the multiplication. "X is 200% of Y" should be translated as X=2Y, and "X is 2 times Y" should be translated as X=2Y.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by simone88 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:26 pm
thanks. I didn't know that because in italian the statement "2 times grater than" means just 2*
What about the possibility to elide the rate of increase in vikram4689 was talking about?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1