saketk wrote:GMATplanet wrote:The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.
A. which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell
B. which had increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it had fallen
C. which have increased five percent during the first three months of this year after falling
D. with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after falling
E. with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after having fallen
OA is C.
OA is D
My question is why is "with" in D is wrong? Isn't "with ..." here modifying profits? Or it's modifying the whole sentence? How can you tell if it's the nearest noun or the whole clause that "with ..." modifies ?
GmatKiss wrote:Please underline the part of the passage which needs to be corrected!
Regards,
GK
First for GK -- the underline post for you
The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits,
which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.
GMATplanet,
Hi -- This is because the use of word "with" does not present a reason. Instead, it gives an impression of additional information. Also -- "Profits" with a 5% increase" is incorrect. Since there is a comma -- we should use "Which" to correctly point towards "Profits"
Now, lets take a look at other option... A and B have "Subject Verb" agreement problem.. Profits is a plural and the use of Singular "IT" is incorrect.. Eliminate both options..
E -- seems wordy and awkward and like option D, option E contains "WITH" --
Therefore the correct answer is
Option C
It correctly uses "Have" for plural "profits" and "Which" is correctly pointing to Profits...
Hi, saketk,thanks for your explanation, I begin to understand your point. So ", with..." is an adverbial modifier? And hence it cannot modify profits. Is this understanding correct? then IS there any chance that a "with....,"or ", with..." construction will modifier modify a noun?
And as for the part "with" cannot present a reason, the example below seems to suggest the contrary.
Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.
A. Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people
B. As the cost of wireless service plummeted in the last year and as mobile phones became increasingly common, many people
C. In the last year, with the cost of wireless service plummeting, and mobile phones have become increasingly common, there are many people
D. With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are
E. While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are
The OA is D