BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tax Dispute

Expert replies
by gmat009 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:16 pm
The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other'

Plz. explain this..
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Mani_mba » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:27 pm
IMO C.
Join the discussion

by nox104 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:57 am
C it is. The true intent of the sentence is to say that each side is creating dificulties for the other..

We generally use both when both the objects (teams, sides..) are doing the same stuff. e.g., Both sides are trying their best to win the game. Both sides are intent on creating difficulties [for someone else].
Join the discussion

by s_kaks » Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:02 am
C it is
Join the discussion

by perfectstranger » Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:24 pm
Could someone clear why d is wrong ?

(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

Re: Tax Dispute

by n_niaz » Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:10 am
gmat009 wrote:The complex tax dispute between the Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township is not likely to be adjudicated for several years, and, in the meantime, both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other.
(A) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for the other
(B) both sides are intent on creating difficulties for each other
(C) each side is intent on creating difficulties for the other
(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
(E) the sides are both intent on creating difficulties for each other'

Plz. explain this..
C it is - clear!
Join the discussion

by diane8284 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:17 am
perfectstranger wrote:Could someone clear why d is wrong ?

(D) each side is intent on creating difficulties for one another
- "for one another" implies there is more than two sides. here is two sides - Covered Bridge Mall and Harris Township - so one would create difficulties for the other... not "for one another"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1