-
ankita1709
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:09 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:2 members
My Answer is C. Please, Elaborate why it can not be?
Politician: Since my administration entered office percentage of people looking for work but unable to find it has dropped from 7% to 5% of the total number of people either working or looking for work. These statistics show that my administration's business-friendly policies have helped reduce the level of unemployment among those willing to work.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the politician's argument relies?
A. The previous administration's worker re-education program had no significant effect on the unemployment rate.
--> We are not sure which business friendly policy has been used. No.
B. Less than 2% of the population working or willing to work at the start of the politician's term have stopped working or looking for work.
-->Argument cann't rely on this assumption, becuase Argument will be wrong if less than 2% is 1%.
C. None of the new jobs created during the politician's term went to those who already had jobs.
--> This is the fact on which argument relies. If it is false, then Argument get discouraged.
D. Most of those looking for employment found jobs into the field they were trained in.
In general statement and Argument can not rely on this.













