Sports Historians

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

Sports Historians

by komal » Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:31 pm
According to some sports historians, professional tennis players develop unique playing styles that result from a combination of the peculiarities of each player's physical attributes and the influence of coaches during their early adaptation to the game. But when the increase in strength and endurance of modem players is discounted, it becomes readily apparent that the playing styles of the current crop of professional tennis players are no different from the styles of players from previous generations. Clearly, there is a universally efficient tennis style to which all professional tennis players conform.

The argument above is most weakened by which of the following statements?

(A) The differences in physical attributes among tennis players are even more pronounced than the sports historians believe.

(B) Few current professional tennis players are familiar with the professional tennis players of fifty years ago.

(C) The increased strength of current tennis players contributes more to the development of individual playing styles than does increased endurance.

(D) All of the early coaches of today's professional tennis players were professional tennis players themselves earlier in their lives.

(E) Weight training and greater attention to diet are the primary factors in the increased strength and stamina of the current generation of professional tennis players.

OA D
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by akahuja143 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:25 pm
Conculsion is
Clearly, there is a universally efficient tennis style to which all professional tennis players conform.


(A) The differences in physical attributes among tennis players are even more pronounced than the sports historians believe. -- no effect on conculsion
(B) Few current professional tennis players are familiar with the professional tennis players of fifty years ago. -- Strengthen the conculsion because if few players are familar then style got be uni..

(C) The increased strength of current tennis players contributes more to the development of individual playing styles than does increased endurance. -- no effect on the conculsion because it is not about strength and endurance but about style
(D) All of the early coaches of today's professional tennis players were professional tennis players themselves earlier in their lives. -- [the influence of coaches during their early adaptation to the game] -- weakens --Correct

(E) Weight training and greater attention to diet are the primary factors in the increased strength and stamina of the current generation of professional tennis players. --- out of scope

Hope this helps..

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:26 pm
This is from Kaplan 800? I think I remember this one

A- This is irrelevant. Has nothing to do with the argument

B- Their familiarity with older players doesn't matter. If there is a universal style then they would adopt that style naturally without emulating it.

C- This contradicts the argument

D- Correct

E- Increased strength has nothing to do with the conclusion. This is playing off of a premise.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:37 pm
osirus0830 wrote:This is from Kaplan 800? I think I remember this one


Yes it is : )

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:17 pm
The official answer is A. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain