Extinct bird

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times
Followed by:2 members

Re: Extinct bird

by mals24 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:40 am
sumitkhurana wrote:but do you guys agree with the explaination.
I agree :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:27 am
Thanked: 7 times

by welcome » Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:18 am
See the difference between 1895 and 1815 (80 years), so this is very logical to think that in 1895, when some one must have seen that bird, has treated as mistaken because bird was very rare to see.

Now see the conclusion, it will be weaken by this.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590