BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

SC Grail - tax code

Expert replies
by AIM GMAT » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:19 pm
The proposed simplification of the tax code would repeal or modify a number of
popular tax breaks, including the deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so
that income tax rates could be reduced
across the board.

A. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could
be reduced

B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be
reduced

C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could
be reduced

D. would repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so as to reduce income tax rates

E. would repeal and modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could
be reduced


OA B
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by bubbliiiiiiii » Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:24 am
Here we see a 3/2 split at the begining of the answer choices between 'would be' (ADE) and 'will be' (BC).

'will be' seems appropriate here since the plan is already proposed, the effects of the plan can also be figured. Thus, eliminate options A, D and E.

Between B and C.

B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be
reduced

In idiomatic expression x so that y, x and y are properly compared using will and can.

C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could
be reduced

Improper comparison by the usage of will and could. 'Which' incorrectly describes the taxes.




I first chose would be over will be and concluded A to be the answer. However, when I saw the answer choices I understood why B is appropriate.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by tetura84 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:27 am
Between B and C, there is another difference,
COMMA + including vs COMMA + which + includes

which one is correct?
what are the usages of these two forms?
78 clicks can change my life !
Join the discussion

by nikeboy2008 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:09 pm
including and which includes are both correct depending on the sentence.

in this case, it should be "which include" as tax breaks in plural...however, in choice C it says "which incudes" - S-V error
Join the discussion

by btgyes » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:25 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Here we see a 3/2 split at the begining of the answer choices between 'would be' (ADE) and 'will be' (BC).

'will be' seems appropriate here since the plan is already proposed, the effects of the plan can also be figured. Thus, eliminate options A, D and E.

Between B and C.

B. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, including the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates can be
reduced

In idiomatic expression x so that y, x and y are properly compared using will and can.

C. will repeal or modify a number of popular tax breaks, which includes the
deductibility of mortgage interest payments, so that income tax rates could
be reduced

Improper comparison by the usage of will and could. 'Which' incorrectly describes the taxes.


I first chose would be over will be and concluded A to be the answer. However, when I saw the answer choices I understood why B is appropriate.
To what WHICH should describe if not TAXES... ?

secondly, still it is very vague CAN / COULD issue

i do not think WILL and COULD can't be used in one sentence....

.... could any experts plz comment on this thread...

ta
Join the discussion

by winnerhere » Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:43 am
Is there any rule that eliminates "would" and prefers the usage of "Will"

I found that these lines were taken from a news as below

https://local2452afge.com/SSA%20attacked%20again.htm

which uses would and could.
Join the discussion

by amma4u » Sun Feb 20, 2011 7:01 am
First, winnerhere, nice search result on the article.

I guess the reason the article uses "would" and "could" because the entire article is talking of a future proposal.

Vs

In the question stem it is more for sure happening/approved proposal, just my thought :mrgreen:

Also, I guess "will" goes with "can" and "would" goes with "could"

any expert reply?
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:11 am
btgyes wrote:
To what WHICH should describe if not TAXES... ?

secondly, still it is very vague CAN / COULD issue

i do not think WILL and COULD can't be used in one sentence....

.... could any experts plz comment on this thread...

ta
In my understanding, which should describe the simplified proposal and it does so. Thanks for scrutinizing my opinion. :)

As far as WILL and COULD are concerned, I believe that while comparing two clauses, both of them should have similar structures. Here in this case, the first clause uses WILL (something which is going to happen) while the second uses Could (something which may or may not happen).

I would be more happy to see expert's comments here. [:)]
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by btgyes » Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:29 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:
btgyes wrote:
To what WHICH should describe if not TAXES... ?

secondly, still it is very vague CAN / COULD issue

i do not think WILL and COULD can't be used in one sentence....

.... could any experts plz comment on this thread...

ta
In my understanding, which should describe the simplified proposal and it does so. Thanks for scrutinizing my opinion. :)

As far as WILL and COULD are concerned, I believe that while comparing two clauses, both of them should have similar structures. Here in this case, the first clause uses WILL (something which is going to happen) while the second uses Could (something which may or may not happen).

I would be more happy to see expert's comments here. [:)]
Acc to me , which should be describing TAX BREAKS NOT the simplified proposal

regarding second issue, waiting for expert's comments..

It would be great if any expert could explain these two critical issues...

ta
Join the discussion

by garry123 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:02 am
Since the author does not know what actually happened, the tone of the author must be subjunctive. Hence the use of 'would' and 'could' is better than that of 'will' and 'can'.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1