As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
As sources of electrical power, windmills
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
almost expected is meaningless, and so is which referring back to year. So ABE out. I am not to happy choosing either of C or D, but split infinitive in D suggest me to go for C.
Charged up again to beat the beast
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
- Thanked: 70 times
- Followed by:6 members
Bad question in my opinion. A,B,E are clearly out for reasons provided by maihuna.
Option C
production is expected that something will happen - Weird construction. Doesn't make any sense.
Option D
Production is expected almost
- to double by the end of the year
and thus
- to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
Now frankly, production is expected to provide sounds crazy to me.
The use of almost is so strange in four choices. Ideally, it should limit double, in the sense that production is expected to almost double. Only choice C has that. However, the construction of C is weird, as outlined above.
Option C
production is expected that something will happen - Weird construction. Doesn't make any sense.
Option D
In D, the parallel elements are -clock60 wrote:i hope that in D we deal with ||-ism issue
to double..and thus to provide
Production is expected almost
- to double by the end of the year
and thus
- to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
Now frankly, production is expected to provide sounds crazy to me.
The use of almost is so strange in four choices. Ideally, it should limit double, in the sense that production is expected to almost double. Only choice C has that. However, the construction of C is weird, as outlined above.
scio me nihil scire
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO Daspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
It seems to be an issue of parallelism.
Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion
Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...
Which one seems better?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
OA given is D ........I am confused with the usage of "thus to provide" because though the same maintains parallelism but meaning of the sentence is not clear.........
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Why so? Doesn't it follow the Chronological Sequence.aspirant2011 wrote:OA given is D ........I am confused with the usage of "thus to provide" because though the same maintains parallelism but meaning of the sentence is not clear.........
NOW Windmil acct ONLY 2.5k MW -> BUT prod is expctd 2 dbl -> and thus 2 provide enuf elec...
- cans
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 310 times
- Followed by:123 members
- GMAT Score:750
As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
Expected to double and thus expected to provide enough.........
Expected to double and thus expected to provide enough.........
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Sameer,sameerballani wrote:IMO Daspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
It seems to be an issue of parallelism.
Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion
Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...
Which one seems better?
in option C whats wrong with "it"???????? isn't this "it" refering to production
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Hi,aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Sameer,sameerballani wrote:IMO Daspirant2011 wrote:As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
A. almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
B. almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
C. expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
D. expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
E. expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
[spoiler]OA: Will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
It seems to be an issue of parallelism.
Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion
Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...
Which one seems better?
in option C whats wrong with "it"???????? isn't this "it" refering to production
It is trying to refer to production only but the point is that its not required and it results in awkwardness.
Just Listen how it sounds-
production is expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
Also, I m not able to recall wat it is exactly, BUT there is some rule that when restating a subject in a relative clause, don't mention it as IT. Something like this..
More concise form could be: It is expected that production will... or Production is expected to double
I hope this helps
Thanks
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
There's nothing wrong per se with "is expected to provide" (The class is expected to provide its own pencils for the exam), but yes, "almost" is wrong in four choices and right in a choice that's wrong for other reasons.niksworth wrote:Bad question in my opinion. A,B,E are clearly out for reasons provided by maihuna.
Now frankly, production is expected to provide sounds crazy to me.
The use of almost is so strange in four choices. Ideally, it should limit double, in the sense that production is expected to almost double. Only choice C has that. However, the construction of C is weird, as outlined above.