Having to do any algebra is annoying to me sometimes, but I guess I will bang this one out.
(1) (x + y)(1/x + 1/y) = 16
Multiply out the left side to get 1 + y/x + x/y + 1 = 16
y/x + x/y = 14
If x were equal to y, then y/x and x/y would both be 1. So y/x + x/y would be 2, instead of 14.
So x does not equal y and Statement 1 is sufficient.
Hmm. That wasn't too annoying. Maybe I should lighten up.
Taking Statement 2, (x - 3)2 - (y - 3)2 = 0, we can divide the entire thing by 2 and get (x - 3) - (y - 3) = 0.
This becomes (x - 3) = (y - 3), and so obviously x = y and Statement 2 is sufficient as well.
There is an issue with this question as the two statements give different answers to the question, which situation does not make sense. Official GMAT questions are set up so that the statements and any data given in the question are consistent.
Still, I guess one can go with it and choose D.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
AS #30
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Last edited by MartyMurray on Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Hi Marty,Marty Murray wrote:
Taking Statement 2, (x - 3)2 - (y - 3)2 = 0, we can multiply the entire thing by 2 and get (x - 3) - (y - 3) = 0.
Could you verify the above calculation please?
Fixed it. I guess that's why you're management!!!
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
S1::
Suppose x = y. Then we have
(x + x)(1/x + 1/x) = 16, or
(2x)(2/x) = 16, or
4 = 16. This is preposterous, so x ≠ y; SUFFICIENT.
S2::
(x - 3)² - (y - 3)² = 0
(x - 3)² = (y - 3)²
So y = x or y = 6 - x; NOT SUFFICIENT.
The answer is A.
Suppose x = y. Then we have
(x + x)(1/x + 1/x) = 16, or
(2x)(2/x) = 16, or
4 = 16. This is preposterous, so x ≠ y; SUFFICIENT.
S2::
(x - 3)² - (y - 3)² = 0
(x - 3)² = (y - 3)²
So y = x or y = 6 - x; NOT SUFFICIENT.
The answer is A.
This is an issue with several of the questions this user has posted, but as far as I can tell this question is actually fine. (I'm guessing S2 is (x - 3)² = (y - 3)², not 2*(x - 3) = 2*(y - 3); virtually any time I see x2 on this forum, the poster seems to mean to have typed x².)Marty Murray wrote:There is an issue with this question as the two statements give different answers to the question, which situation does not make sense. Official GMAT questions are set up so that the statements and any data given in the question are consistent.
Haha! Actually I thought there was a typo with this statement: (x - 3)2 - (y-3)2 = 0.Marty Murray wrote:Fixed it. I guess that's why you're management!!!
I always see similar statements written as 2(x - 3) - 2(y-3) = 0 if the terms were to be multiplied together. I thought the poster meant (^2) instead.
Sorry. Yes i meant (^2)theCEO wrote:Haha! Actually I thought there was a typo with this statement: (x - 3)2 - (y-3)2 = 0.Marty Murray wrote:Fixed it. I guess that's why you're management!!!
I always see similar statements written as 2(x - 3) - 2(y-3) = 0 if the terms were to be multiplied together. I thought the poster meant (^2) instead.
You can always use superscripts: just copy and paste, or use the shortcut code. (The superscripts are so much easier to read; most of the experts use them on the forums for that reason.)oquiella wrote:Sorry. Yes i meant (^2)theCEO wrote:Haha! Actually I thought there was a typo with this statement: (x - 3)2 - (y-3)2 = 0.Marty Murray wrote:Fixed it. I guess that's why you're management!!!
I always see similar statements written as 2(x - 3) - 2(y-3) = 0 if the terms were to be multiplied together. I thought the poster meant (^2) instead.
















