BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

AS # 19

Expert replies
by oquiella » Sat Oct 24, 2015 12:38 pm
19. If the cost price of two toys X and Y is in the ratio 8:15, is the profit on Y more than
the profit on X?


(1) The selling price of the two toys X and Y is in the ratio 1:2
(2) The marked price of the two toys X and Y is in the ratio 2:3


PLEASE EXPLAIN
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by MartyMurray » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:16 pm
I started thinking about theories of what increases what, but maybe the best thing is to just use hard numbers here.

Let's say that the cost of X is actually 8 and the cost of Y is actually 15.

The smallest change we could make to satisfy Statement 1 is to make the selling price of Y 16 and leave the selling price of X at 8.

So the profit on Y would be 1 and the profit on X would be 0.

Beyond that, at any selling price for Y, the profit is always higher than that on X as we are basically always adding 2 to the price of Y for every 1 we add to the price of X.

This pattern would hold for any costs of X and Y in the ratio 8:15, basically because 15 is a little less than twice 8. So right from the start we need to add more to the cost of Y to get the selling price than we need to add to the cost of X.

I am not sure what Statement 2 is saying. Is it saying that there is another price that is marked on the toys but which is not the actual selling price?

Without a definition of the marked price, I am not sure how to finish this question.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:34 pm
I'm guessing that the marked price is what the seller WANTED to get and that the selling price is what he ACTUALLY GOT.

Under this assumption, the "marked price" of the toys is irrelevant, so the answer is A or E. Now let's work with S1.

X costs the merchant 8b and Y costs the merchant 15b.

X is sold for d and Y is sold for 2d.

We want to know if

Y Profit > X Profit, or

2d - 15b > d - 8b, or

d > 7b

As with some of the other terribly written and edited questions submitted by this user, there are Barber of Seville implications to the wording here. ("The profit on Y" seems to imply that such a profit exists, but there may have been no profit at all, in which case the problem is stated in impossible terms.)

But since profit implies a gain, I guess we have to assume given the prompt that d - 8b > 0 and 2d - 15b > 0. Therefore d > 8b and S1 is sufficient: d - 8b > 0 implies d > 8b -- and obviously b is positive, since it represents a price paid -- so d > 7b is true and the profit on Y is greater than the profit on X.
Join the discussion