BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

gmat test code - 42

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

gmat test code - 42

by nikhilkatira » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:12 am
People who live unusually long tend to have been lean young adults who went on to gain approximately one pound every year, so lean young adults can improve their chances of living a long life by gaining about a pound every year.

A flaw in the argument above is that it

(A) gives reasons for the truth of its conclusion that presuppose the truth of that conclusion

(B) proceeds as though a condition that by itself is enough to guarantee a certain result must always be present for that result to be achieved

(C) assumes without proof that two phenomena that occur together share an underlying cause

(D) concludes that one phenomenon is the cause of another when at most what has been established is an association between them

(E) fails to recognize that a tendency widely shared by a subgroup within a given population will not necessarily be widely shared by that population as a whole
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:27 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members

by ashish2104 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:31 am
IMO D.

I was caught in two choices, B and D.
Here's how I proceeded.
The argumet begins by mentioning that 1pound/year weight gain results in long life. This sets up a causal premise. Based on this, the author concludes that the reverse is true, which is a common flaw.
The author has only established a relation between the two. the cause->effect relationship has not been established properly.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:37 am
IMO D

Premises:
People who live unusually long tend to have been lean young adults who went on to gain approximately one pound every year
Conclusion:
lean young adults can improve their chances of living a long life by gaining about a pound every year.

(A) gives reasons for the truth of its conclusion that presuppose the truth of that conclusion
This option says that premise supports conclusion and viceversa. But, as per passage conclusion is not supporting the premise. Both are different.
(B) proceeds as though a condition that by itself is enough to guarantee a certain result must always be present for that result to be achieved
There is no condition specified here.
(C) assumes without proof that two phenomena that occur together share an underlying cause
Argument doesnt say that both weight gain and long life are occuring together. Moreover, the causes for both may be different.
(D) concludes that one phenomenon is the cause of another when at most what has been established is an association between them
Looks perfect. Here cause is Gaining a pound a year. Effect is chances of living longer.
There is just association between them.
(E) fails to recognize that a tendency widely shared by a subgroup within a given population will not necessarily be widely shared by that population as a whole
"population as a whole" - this makes this answer wrong. Argument discusses only about "lean young people" both in premise and conclusion.

Hope this helps!!
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

by nikhilkatira » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:52 am
kvcpk wrote:IMO D

Premises:
People who live unusually long tend to have been lean young adults who went on to gain approximately one pound every year
Conclusion:
lean young adults can improve their chances of living a long life by gaining about a pound every year.

(A) gives reasons for the truth of its conclusion that presuppose the truth of that conclusion
This option says that premise supports conclusion and viceversa. But, as per passage conclusion is not supporting the premise. Both are different.
(B) proceeds as though a condition that by itself is enough to guarantee a certain result must always be present for that result to be achieved
There is no condition specified here.
(C) assumes without proof that two phenomena that occur together share an underlying cause
Argument doesnt say that both weight gain and long life are occuring together. Moreover, the causes for both may be different.
(D) concludes that one phenomenon is the cause of another when at most what has been established is an association between them
Looks perfect. Here cause is Gaining a pound a year. Effect is chances of living longer.
There is just association between them.
(E) fails to recognize that a tendency widely shared by a subgroup within a given population will not necessarily be widely shared by that population as a whole
"population as a whole" - this makes this answer wrong. Argument discusses only about "lean young people" both in premise and conclusion.

Hope this helps!!
what level would you rate this question ?
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:32 am
nikhilkatira wrote: what level would you rate this question ?
Well.. I am not an expert.. But, I heard that flaw in the reasoning and Method of reasoning questions appear only when we are doing quite good in the exam. So should be a 700+ question.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1