BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Wind power

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:43 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

Wind power

by rahulvsd » Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:17 pm
An Environmental Impact Coalition report shows that wind power produces the fewest pollutants among all green energy alternatives. This shows that EnergyMill wind turbines are the best choice for powering new developments in rural areas.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?
(A) An earlier Environmental Impact Coalition report showed that solar power produces fewer pollutants than does wind power.
(B) In the last five years, the government has invested more in wind power than in any other form of green energy.
(C) The dispersion of homes in rural areas makes wind power several times more expensive that conventional energy sources.
(D) The difference between the number of pollutants generated by wind power and conventional power sources is quite pronounced.
(E) The Environmental Impact Coalition issues reports only once a year.

[spoiler]OA:C. Isn't C out of scope here. [/spoiler]
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:35 pm
C fits perfectly. The conclusion is that wind power is better source of energy for rural developments than are other sources of energy. If wind power is actually many times more expensive, then it may not be the best choice.

The trick here is that the stimulus offers a fairly broad conclusion (wind power is the best!) from a rather specific premise (wind power pollutes less than other green energy alternatives). It's a fairly common setup, and when we see it we should be ready to take note of other factors (like finances in this case) that could affect the validity of the conclusion.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:36 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:620

by heymayank08 » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:49 am
can you pls explain why A is wrong in this.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:06 am
heymayank08 wrote:can you pls explain why A is wrong in this.
A might deviate one to think that reports are not reliable because conclusion is varied but it might be the case that this report is more research and hence reliable. Since nothing is given it can be either way, so A DOES NOT AFFECT as it can strengthen or weaken.

Although i agree 99.999% with my statements above, Better strategy would be to keep such options till you find a better option because it might happen (rarely) that in GMAT no better option is available then we can more ponder on such statements.

Experts may comment on my understanding and strategy
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:51 am
A vs C, IMO: C
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:36 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:620

by heymayank08 » Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:26 pm
but in this case it is nowhere mentioned that the low cost will be favourable.
instead we are assuming it.
but assuming in case of CR is a big mistake isn't it!
and option A is not even out of scope of the argument so
i would say that the option A is the best :lol:
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:19 am
heymayank08 wrote:but in this case it is nowhere mentioned that the low cost will be favourable.
instead we are assuming it.
but assuming in case of CR is a big mistake isn't it!
and option A is not even out of scope of the argument so
i would say that the option A is the best :lol:
We are not assuming it. In fact you can refer to section description of CR from any OG where it is mentioned that question would require you to apply common sense. There is silver-line difference between assumption and common sense. "Low cost will be favorable" is common sense after all EVERYONE WORLD (including you and me) wants to SAVE MONEY, don't we :)
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:33 am
Location: Pune,India
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:6 members

by GMAT Kolaveri » Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:54 am
(A) An earlier Environmental Impact Coalition report showed that solar power produces fewer pollutants than does wind power. This does not weaken. An earlier report is not relevant.
(B) In the last five years, the government has invested more in wind power than in any other form of green energy. Does not weaken. COST ANGLE Incorrect option. One of GMAT's most frequently used incorrect AO
(C) The dispersion of homes in rural areas makes wind power several times more expensive that conventional energy sources. Weakens. Might be more expensive in rural area.
(D) The difference between the number of pollutants generated by wind power and conventional power sources is quite pronounced.NOT RELEVANT
(E) The Environmental Impact Coalition issues reports only once a year. NOT RELEVANT TO CONCLUSION
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

by [email protected] » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:12 am
An Environmental Impact Coalition report shows that wind power produces the fewest pollutants among all green energy alternatives. This shows that EnergyMill wind turbines are the best choice for powering new developments in rural areas.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?
(A) An earlier Environmental Impact Coalition report showed that solar power produces fewer pollutants than does wind power.
(B) In the last five years, the government has invested more in wind power than in any other form of green energy.
(C) The dispersion of homes in rural areas makes wind power several times more expensive that conventional energy sources.
(D) The difference between the number of pollutants generated by wind power and conventional power sources is quite pronounced.
(E) The Environmental Impact Coalition issues reports only once a year.

Remember that the conclusion or the decision is to be taken based on the current report and not based on the previous reports...

Just like this year's election will decide which party will get selected and not the previous reports.

Option A: From the above perspective, this option does not affect the argument.

Option B: Strengthens the argument.

Option C: Weakens the argument.

Option D: Strengthens the argument.

Option E: Does not affect the argument.

Hence the correct answer is C.

Just to understand that whether this year's report will help or the previous reports will...

Hope this helps...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1