-
mkbigmoz
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:53 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
I will post a question which I missed from the Kaplan CATs. I will also post my explanation on how I interpreted the question. Im looking for advice on how I should adjust my interpretations because obviously, I am wrong.
A car was initially traveling at an average speed of 48 miles per hour. During each of ten successive 10-minute intervals, the car decreased its average speed by 4 miles per hour. How many miles did the car travel in the seventh 10-minute interval?
2
3
4
5
6
[spoiler]4
My answer was 3 1/3, which I just rounded down to 3. I started at 48, and by the time I got to the 7th interval, my speed was at 20 mph. Kaplan states that the first interval of decrease is at the 2nd interval. So the car was still moving at 48 during the first interval, and thus by the 7th interval was at 24 mph. Why should we assume that the first decrease was at the second interval instead of the first?[/spoiler]
A car was initially traveling at an average speed of 48 miles per hour. During each of ten successive 10-minute intervals, the car decreased its average speed by 4 miles per hour. How many miles did the car travel in the seventh 10-minute interval?
2
3
4
5
6
[spoiler]4
My answer was 3 1/3, which I just rounded down to 3. I started at 48, and by the time I got to the 7th interval, my speed was at 20 mph. Kaplan states that the first interval of decrease is at the 2nd interval. So the car was still moving at 48 during the first interval, and thus by the 7th interval was at 24 mph. Why should we assume that the first decrease was at the second interval instead of the first?[/spoiler]












