BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Function

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:09 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by Pharo » Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:54 am
Are you sure this is a valid question? I can see no way of drawing a linear function with these requirements. (This also does not fit in the "Data Sufficiency" type of questions)

The first condition states that f is an increasing function in the {1,2} range (thus the function will look like : y = mx + b)
The second condition states that f is a decreasing function in the {3,4} range. (thus the function will look like : y = -mx + b)

The two conditions are mutually exclusive for a linear function. (i.e. a linear function can only have one behaviour; either increasing or decreasing).
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 amFollowed by: 80 members
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:14 am
Pharo wrote:Are you sure this is a valid question? I can see no way of drawing a linear function with these requirements. (This also does not fit in the "Data Sufficiency" type of questions)

The first condition states that f is an increasing function in the {1,2} range (thus the function will look like : y = mx + b)
The second condition states that f is a decreasing function in the {3,4} range. (thus the function will look like : y = -mx + b)

The two conditions are mutually exclusive for a linear function. (i.e. a linear function can only have one behaviour; either increasing or decreasing).
Reasoning is a bit less than perfect, but yes, the question sounds dubious to me.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:11 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 35 times

by Shalabh's Quants » Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:58 am
Pharo wrote:Are you sure this is a valid question? I can see no way of drawing a linear function with these requirements. (This also does not fit in the "Data Sufficiency" type of questions)

The first condition states that f is an increasing function in the {1,2} range (thus the function will look like : y = mx + b)
The second condition states that f is a decreasing function in the {3,4} range. (thus the function will look like : y = -mx + b)

The two conditions are mutually exclusive for a linear function. (i.e. a linear function can only have one behaviour; either increasing or decreasing).
There looks to be mathematical fallacy in question...

Say linear fn is f(x)=ax+b;

Then, f(1)=a.1+b=a+b;

f(2)=a.2+b=2a+b;

As f(1)<f(2)...that means a+b < 2a+b => a>0;-----(1)

Again, f(3)=a.3+b=3a+b;

f(4)=a.4+b=4a+b;

As f(3)>f(4)...that means 3a+b > 4a+b => a<0;------(2)

Results from (1) & (2) are contradicting.
Shalabh Jain,
e-GMAT Instructor
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:38 am
Thanked: 20 times

by shubham_k » Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:17 am
Hi,
The only way the given three conditions can be true is by assuming that the given function is piece wise linear.
Image

Image
following attachments show the examples of piecewise linear functions. But even after assuming that it would be difficult to comment on f(0) due to insufficient information.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:09 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by Pharo » Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:33 am
sanju09 wrote:
Pharo wrote:Are you sure this is a valid question? I can see no way of drawing a linear function with these requirements. (This also does not fit in the "Data Sufficiency" type of questions)

The first condition states that f is an increasing function in the {1,2} range (thus the function will look like : y = mx + b)
The second condition states that f is a decreasing function in the {3,4} range. (thus the function will look like : y = -mx + b)

The two conditions are mutually exclusive for a linear function. (i.e. a linear function can only have one behaviour; either increasing or decreasing).
Reasoning is a bit less than perfect, but yes, the question sounds dubious to me.
How would you make it perfect?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:11 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 35 times

by Shalabh's Quants » Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:23 am
Md.Nazrul Islam wrote:Let f be a linear function with properties that f(1)< f(2) ,f (3)> f(4) and f(5)=5 ,which of the statement is true .

a) f(0)>8 b)f(0) =0 c) f(0)=5 d) f(0) =2 .

There looks to be mathematical fallacy in question...

Say linear fn is f(x)=ax+b;

Then, f(1)=a.1+b=a+b;

f(2)=a.2+b=2a+b;

As f(1)<f(2)...that means a+b < 2a+b => a>0;-----(1)

Again, f(3)=a.3+b=3a+b;

f(4)=a.4+b=4a+b;

As f(3)>f(4)...that means 3a+b > 4a+b => a<0;------(2)

Results from (1) & (2) are contradicting.
Shalabh Jain,
e-GMAT Instructor
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pmFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 158 times

by pemdas » Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:38 pm
This one got my attention

Firstly, the linear function can either increase or decrease, BUT it cannot increase and decrease at the same time. If the latter is a case, then we don't have a linear function.
The question explicitly states that f is a linear function, i.e. f(x)=ax+b where a is the slope and b is y-intercept. With the condition f(1)<f(2) the slope is positive (a>0). For f(3)>f(4), the slope is negative (a<0). Finally, with f(5)=5 the slope is unknown and we learn only about one point (x,y) as (5,5).

The answer choices given propose only one input of "x" for f(x), this is x=0. So effectively, we may ignore our just recently "over-verbolized" theory of a function slope. We need only y-intercept to answet this question, because x=0. Is there any opportunity we can find the y-intercept from the data given in our question?
Because we are given not one but several functional relationships and our functions' y-intercepts are unknown, we may not answer this question. This is an example of the bad question-answer combination.
Md.Nazrul Islam wrote:Let f be a linear function with properties that f(1)< f(2) ,f (3)> f(4) and f(5)=5 ,which of the statement is true .

a) f(0)>8 b)f(0) =0 c) f(0)=5 d) f(0) =2 .
Success doesn't come overnight!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 amFollowed by: 120 members
Location: New York City
Thanked: 188 times
GMAT Score:770

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:47 pm
Hey Guys,

Yep. Ignore questions like this. (It only has four answer choices!).

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1