BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Aristotle SC Bank. 20.

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

Aristotle SC Bank. 20.

by vineeshp » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:39 pm
Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be
able to compete against private firms.

A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms.

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?[/spoiler]
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:02 pm
This is a nice question.

I chose B ..but after looking at the OA, the only difference I find between B and E is the casual tone(should) VS necessity(will).
...waiting for experts to comment.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:33 pm
I think this question follows (if....then....)conditional structure.

If....(present tense)..then...(future tense)
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:10 pm
Manhattan SC guide says
Are to is awkward and should be avoided .
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:49 am
vineeshp wrote:Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they want to be
able to compete against private firms.

A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms.

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?[/spoiler]
Nopes I don't think so that there is a change in the meaning of if they are to & if they wish to...........also can u please share with me the Aristotle SC's which you have with you :-) ?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:53 am
It would be great if you could post the Aristotle SC right here on BTG. That way anyone will be able to download and use them
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:42 am
A. Public companies will be required to raise their governance game if they
want to be able to compete against private firms ( CONTENDER )
B. Public companies should raise their governance game if they wish to compete
with private firms ( ORIGINAL QUESTION SAYS - Will be required to, this option says - "should", which means a condition, INCORRECT )
C. Public companies would need to raise their governance game if they wish to
compete against private firms ( WOULD + if clause in present tense, INCORRECT )
D. Public companies have to need to raise their governance game if they are to
be in competition with private firms ( have to need to - Wierd and condition - INCORRECT )
E. Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to
compete with private firms. ( CONTENDOR )

I choose E over A, because "
will need to" is better than "will be required to".
"they are to" is less wordy than "want to be able to".

Overall E is more concise and active than A.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:29 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by Bek » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:15 pm
I hope this will help
Last edited by Bek on Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:29 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by Bek » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:16 pm
I found original sentence in "McKinsey on Finance".

Public companies will need to raise their governance game if they are to compete with private firms.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 162 times
Followed by:45 members
GMAT Score:760

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:27 pm
vineeshp wrote:Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?
It's a slight change in meaning. "to be + to" encompasses desire and obligation and expectation all in one. I don't remember seeing anything in the OG about it being awkward (but that doesn't mean it doesn't say that!).
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:39 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:640

by sachindia » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:27 pm
Jim@Grockit wrote:
vineeshp wrote:Just wonder if the change from if they wish to if they are to is ok. Isn't there a slight change in the meaning?
It's a slight change in meaning. "to be + to" encompasses desire and obligation and expectation all in one. I don't remember seeing anything in the OG about it being awkward (but that doesn't mean it doesn't say that!).
is 'if they are to' to be avoided? is it really awkward? :O
Regards,
Sach
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

by sana.noor » Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:19 am
E is the only right answer
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1