BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

animal allegy

Expert replies
by magical cook » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:19 pm
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop
animal-induced allergies, a significant percentage of which are quite serious. In a
survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced
allergies. However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy
is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
Which of the following hypotheses receives the strongest support from the
information given?


A. The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo
employees is lower than that among the general population.
B. Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious
than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with
animals.
C. Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause
animal-induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept
in zoos.
D. There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced
allergy is higher than 30 percent.
E. Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with
animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced
allergies is significantly more than 30 percent.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bharat » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
I believe the answer must be E.

Note that approx 30% zoo employees get the allergy & hence switch the jobs...thus they move to other jobs (or become the general population).

Just to add in filtering useful information, the given information never discusses about the pets (C) or higher/lower risk in other professions or general populations.

Let me know in case of any errors.
Join the discussion

by camitava » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:53 am
Agree with Bharat. IMO E too! What is the OA?
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by raulverde » Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:02 am
A.

The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo
employees is lower than that among the general population.

**However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy
is very likely to switch to some other occupation. **

OA please
Join the discussion

by magical cook » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:13 am
Thank you, I was also thinkint between E and A but now when I think about it again, it should be E.

(sorry I dont have OA for this..)
Join the discussion

by theroadrunnershow » Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:46 pm
Bharat wrote:I believe the answer must be E.

Note that approx 30% zoo employees get the allergy & hence switch the jobs...thus they move to other jobs (or become the general population).

Just to add in filtering useful information, the given information never discusses about the pets (C) or higher/lower risk in other professions or general populations.


Let me know in case of any errors.
how can you conclude that the answer is E when none of the facts mentioned say anything about the likelihood of normal people who spend a lot of time in zoos??
the passage only talks about the likelihood of zookeepers getting the allergies..
Abhishek sunku
Join the discussion

by kate.loo » Tue May 03, 2016 5:39 am
I would go with E as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest
Join the discussion