BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Conference Room

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:550

Conference Room

by Abdulla » Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:05 pm
In a certain conference room each row of chairs has the same number of chairs, and the number of rows is 1 less than the number of chairs in a row. How many chairs are in the row?

(1) There is a total of 72 chairs.
(2) After one chair is removed from the last row, there is a total of 17 chairs in the last two rows.


OA is D
Last edited by Abdulla on Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Abdulla
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:10 pm
1: N*(N-1) = 72

N = -8 , 9

N cannot be negative hence n = 9

2.

ADD 1 to 17 = 18
each row will have 18/2 = 9

hence we have 9 chairs

IMO D
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:22 pm
let the rows be R
let the chairs in each row be ch

r = ch-1

Stmt I

ch * (ch-1) = 72

Possible value ch = 9 ch-1 = 8

9 chairs

SUFF

Stmt II

one chair removed makes it 17 so there were 18 chair in2 rows before removing the 1 chair

Again 9 chairs

SUFF

D)
Last edited by cramya on Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:3 members

Re: Conference Room

by sudhir3127 » Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:34 pm
Abdulla wrote:In a certain conference room each row of chairs has the same number of chairs, and the number of rows is 1 less than the number of chairs in a row. How many chairs are in the row?

(1) There is a total of 72 chairs.
(2) After one chair is removed from the last row, there is a total of 17 chairs in the last two rows.


OA is C
i think this is a gmat prep question and the OA has to be D . Please make sure and doubly chk the questions and Answers before u post, It unncessarily creates confusion and takes a lot of time .
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:550

Re: Conference Room

by Abdulla » Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:59 pm
sudhir3127 wrote:
Abdulla wrote:In a certain conference room each row of chairs has the same number of chairs, and the number of rows is 1 less than the number of chairs in a row. How many chairs are in the row?

(1) There is a total of 72 chairs.
(2) After one chair is removed from the last row, there is a total of 17 chairs in the last two rows.


OA is C
i think this is a gmat prep question and the OA has to be D . Please make sure and doubly chk the questions and Answers before u post, It unncessarily creates confusion and takes a lot of time .
I'm so sorry.. it was my mistake .. i didn't mean it.
Abdulla
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:52 pm
Yep got it .
I used one my take aways to reduce calculation and here it is.
(I am not sure if I can apply in all cases. So pls review and let me
know your feedback.)


Let the number of rows be r
stmt 1: says
r(r+1) = 72.
=> r^2 +r -72 = 0
72 is not a perfect square. So the two roots will be of opposite sign.
Dont care what it is. one of them is +ve which is what I need coz the
chairs and/or rows cannot be -ve. Therefore sufficient.
As a side note: I wonder if I can make the above conclusion.. what if the two roots are -ve something and a +ve fraction. Then both are invalid coz we cannot have fractional rows or chairs.
Am I taking a risk on the GMAT question by assuming that one of the roots will always be 'practical'??

Some one pls comment.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:00 am
Am I taking a risk on the GMAT question by assuming that one of the roots will always be 'practical'??
Hard to tell.

Lets say eqn is x^2+6x+6 (6 is not a perfect square)

One distinct root but -ve.

IMO I would spend the extra 30 secs - minute to make sure it leads to the desired root to predict sufficiency.

Strictly my opinion.Hope I dint miss something in your logic above.

Regards,
Cramya
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Portland, OR
Thanked: 6 times

by pbanavara » Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:34 am
vittalgmat wrote:Yep got it .
I used one my take aways to reduce calculation and here it is.
(I am not sure if I can apply in all cases. So pls review and let me
know your feedback.)


Let the number of rows be r
stmt 1: says
r(r+1) = 72.
=> r^2 +r -72 = 0
72 is not a perfect square. So the two roots will be of opposite sign.
Dont care what it is. one of them is +ve which is what I need coz the
chairs and/or rows cannot be -ve. Therefore sufficient.
As a side note: I wonder if I can make the above conclusion.. what if the two roots are -ve something and a +ve fraction. Then both are invalid coz we cannot have fractional rows or chairs.
Am I taking a risk on the GMAT question by assuming that one of the roots will always be 'practical'??

Some one pls comment.
Honestly I wouldn't risk it .. when u r at this stage - it will take another 10 seconds to figure out the roots and the answer. May be 15 but I would spend the 15 secs and be sure of my answer.

- pradeep
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:07 am
Thank you guys.
I will use it with utmost care.. and may be even abandon this.
good point.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:48 am
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 28 times

Re: Conference Room

by vishubn » Sun Dec 14, 2008 1:17 am
Abdulla wrote:
sudhir3127 wrote:
Abdulla wrote:In a certain conference room each row of chairs has the same number of chairs, and the number of rows is 1 less than the number of chairs in a row. How many chairs are in the row?

(1) There is a total of 72 chairs.
(2) After one chair is removed from the last row, there is a total of 17 chairs in the last two rows.


OA is C
i think this is a gmat prep question and the OA has to be D . Please make sure and doubly chk the questions and Answers before u post, It unncessarily creates confusion and takes a lot of time .

In a way its FUN :)

One will not prove to get to the OA rather prove it to be right

Vishu
I'm so sorry.. it was my mistake .. i didn't mean it.
KILL !! DIE !! or BEAT my FEAR !!! de@D END!!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:59 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Rows

by vladmire » Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:40 am
Can anyone explain how statement one is sufficient by itself? ***note** the number of rows is 1 less than the number of chairs in a row.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1