-
clawhammer
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:08 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
statement 1 simplification is correct. (x-y) = 1/2
For statement 2 remember when you are not given about the sign of variables you can multiply them in inequalities, but you have to consider +ve and -ve cases.
you only considered +ve case.
x/y*y > 1*y this is true when y is +ve, for this statement both the statements have to be considered, y<0 and y>0
when y is -ve :
x/(y) * (y) < (1) (y) ........ note the inequality sign has to be changed.
x < y ...... x is negative as x is less than -y
both statements are not sufficient.
Combining 1 & 2
x-y=1/2 and from statement 2 you know that x > y (both are positive as y is positive in this case) and x < y (both are negative as y is negative in this case)
case 1 - x and y both positive.
from statement 1, x - y =1/2 , this will hold true as x>y , no need to plug numbers.
case 2 - x and y both negative.
from statement 1, x - y =1/2, in this case x < y the difference cannot be +ve hence this is not true. Discard y -ve and x -ve case. Case 1 remains, x and y both are +ve.
Thus 1 & 2 are sufficient.














