BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

DS Sqaure

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 10:24 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members

DS Sqaure

by sanjoy18 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 7:38 am
Square ABCD has an area of 9 square inches. Sides AD and BC are lengthened to x inches each. By how many inches were sides AD and BC lengthened?

(1) The diagonal of the resulting rectangle measures 5 inches.
(2) The resulting rectangle can be cut into three rectangles of equal size.
Image
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Oct 04, 2014 7:57 am
sanjoy18 wrote:Square ABCD has an area of 9 square inches. Sides AD and BC are lengthened to x inches each. By how many inches were sides AD and BC lengthened?

(1) The diagonal of the resulting rectangle measures 5 inches.
(2) The resulting rectangle can be cut into three rectangles of equal size.
Image
Since the area of square ABCD = 9, AB=CD=AD=BC = 3.

Statement 1: The diagonal of the resulting rectangle measures 5 inches.
Implication:
AD=BC=4, so that the diagonal of the resulting rectangle is the hypotenuse of a 3-4-5 triangle.
Thus, AD and BC are each lengthened by x=1 inch.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The resulting rectangle can be cut into three rectangles of equal size.
ANY rectangle can be divided into 3 rectangles of equal size.
To divide a rectangle into 3 rectangles of equal size, simply draw through the interior 2 parallel lines that split the rectangle into 3 equal smaller rectangles.
Since the resulting triangle in statement 2 can be of ANY SIZE, the value of x cannot be determined.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sun Oct 05, 2014 1:18 pm
Hi sanjoy18,

Mitch's explanation showcases a Geometry rule that you're likely to see on Test Day: the 3/4/5 right triangle. The GMAT is a Test of pattern-based questions, so you should be on the lookout for patterns (and each subset of the Quant and Verbal sections has its own built-in patterns).

When it comes to Geometry, right triangles show up in a number of situations. Here, by cutting the square/rectangle from corner-to-corner, we end up with 2 right triangles. When a right triangle is given (or implied), you should think about the Pythagorean Theorem, the 3/4/5 and 5/12/13 right triangles and the 30/60/90 and 45/45/90 triangles. Chances are pretty good that one or more of those patterns is built into the question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by Anaira Mitch » Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:43 am
If the square has an area of 9 square inches, it must have sides of 3 inches each. Therefore, sides AD and BC have lengths of 3 inches each. These sides are lengthened to x inches, while the other two remain at 3 inches. This gives us a rectangle with two opposite sides of length x and two opposite sides of length 3. Then we are asked by how much the two lengthened sides were extended. In other words, what is the value of x - 3? In order to answer this, we need to find the value of x itself.

(1) SUFFICIENT: If the resulting rectangle has a diagonal of 5 inches, we end up with the following:
We can now see that we have a 3-4-5 right triangle, since we have a leg of 3 and a hypotenuse (the diagonal) of 5. The missing leg (in this case, x) must equal 4. Therefore, the two sides were each extended by 4 - 3 = 1 inch.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: It will be possible, no matter what the value of x, to divide the resulting rectangle into three smaller rectangles of equal size. For example, if x = 4, then the area of the rectangle is 12 and we can have three rectangles with an area of 4 each. If x = 5, then the area of the rectangle is 15 and we can have three rectangles with an area of 5 each. So it is not possible to know the value of x from this statement.
The correct answer is A.
Attachments
snip.PNG
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:12 am
sanjoy18 wrote:Square ABCD has an area of 9 square inches. Sides AD and BC are lengthened to x inches each. By how many inches were sides AD and BC lengthened?

(1) The diagonal of the resulting rectangle measures 5 inches.
(2) The resulting rectangle can be cut into three rectangles of equal size.
Image
This question can be solved with a logical deduction approach.

Given that the area of the suqare ABCD = 9 sq inches, we have the side of the square = 3.

S1: Certainly, one can apply a popular template 3-4-5 to get the extended side of the rectangle. However, had statement 1 stated that the diagonal of the resulting rectangle measures [Say 6] inches, even then you could have calculated the value of the extended side of the rectangle by applying Pythogorous theorem. So, indeed there is no need to know what is the value of x till you are sure that x would a unique value and x > 0. Sufficient.

S2: This statement can also be analysed logically. What if the side of the resulting rectangle = 18, in that case x = 18 - 3 = 15. Similarly, if the side of the resulting rectangle = 17 (Any rectangle can be split into three equal rectangles) , in that case x = 17 - 3 = 14. No unique answer. Insufficient.

OA: A

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Singapore | London | Dubai | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1